Stanisław Michalkiewicz w Radiu Maryja - 20.01.2010 r
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Sunday, January 17, 2010
Marco Vincent Dive Resort Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com
Marco Vincent Dive Resort Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com
Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com
Server was never paid to RAQport as promised.
Until the Server is paid to RAQport.com Virginia Company Marco Vincent Dive Resort has no legal right to use the server.
Their manager Mel Agudo from Connecticut office has promised to make the payment and he never did.
As a small business from Virginia I have to collect our money for the advance Web Server Supermicro Hardware.
I know it is not a lot but I do not like when people lie
Please mark this company for your black list: Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com
1. not to travel to Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com in Philippines
2. not to do any business with Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc of Philippines
Do not do any business with Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com or they will take your services, hardware or money
After dealing with US Manager for Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com I will never travel to scuba dive or go for any trip to that resort.
I will tell all my friend from Washington DC IMF and the World Bank not to use this company and Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc
Mvdive is still avoiding to make payment to RAQport Virginia Company for the Web Server which never paid in full.
Please stay away from doing any business with dishonest Marco Vincent Dive Resort. Beware Of Mvdive and their Marco Vincent Dive Resort in The Philippines.
Their US Manager Mel Agudo from Stanford Connecticut did lie about payment several to our company.
Marco Vincent Offices
USA Office :
Business Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 403 Wilton, CT 06897
US Toll Free:
1(866)8196165
Philippines Corporate Office :
Unit 503 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V Dela Costa St. cor. Ayala Ave.
Makati City, Philippines
Tel. Nos. (632)813-6329, (632) 813-6812, (632) 813-6806
Telefax: (632)892-0309
Mobile: (63)-920-951-0128
UK Office :
Contact Persons :
Mel Armitage
Trade Winds
35 Elmshott Lane Cippenham Slough SL1 5QS
UK Telephone : 07956 413924
Email Address : tradewind100@aol.com
To: Mel B. Agudo of Mel B. Agudo
CC:Ronald Servidio [ronald@is-isp.net] and CC http://mvdive.blogspot.com/ Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI)
CC: webmaster@tourism.gov.ph
Mr. Agudo,
With all the respect You Mr. Agudo. You are in fault. I did had great image about people of the Philippines and the people.
But You did change that You were not honest to me.
Why did You Lie To Me as the manage/ director of the Marco Vincent Corporation? and did not reply and did not paid?
You did not keep your gentleman promise and our agreement? All small business is base on trust.
Only $200.00
RAQport.com we are small business and we need money to pay our bills and taxes
Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com
Server was never paid to RAQport as promised.
Until the Server is paid to RAQport.com Virginia Company Marco Vincent Dive Resort has no legal right to use the server.
Their manager Mel Agudo from Connecticut office has promised to make the payment and he never did.
As a small business from Virginia I have to collect our money for the advance Web Server Supermicro Hardware.
I know it is not a lot but I do not like when people lie.
Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com
Server was never paid to RAQport as promised.
Until the Server is paid to RAQport.com Virginia Company Marco Vincent Dive Resort has no legal right to use the server.
Their manager Mel Agudo from Connecticut office has promised to make the payment and he never did.
As a small business from Virginia I have to collect our money for the advance Web Server Supermicro Hardware.
I know it is not a lot but I do not like when people lie
Please mark this company for your black list: Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com
1. not to travel to Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com in Philippines
2. not to do any business with Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc of Philippines
Do not do any business with Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com or they will take your services, hardware or money
After dealing with US Manager for Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com I will never travel to scuba dive or go for any trip to that resort.
I will tell all my friend from Washington DC IMF and the World Bank not to use this company and Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc
Mvdive is still avoiding to make payment to RAQport Virginia Company for the Web Server which never paid in full.
Please stay away from doing any business with dishonest Marco Vincent Dive Resort. Beware Of Mvdive and their Marco Vincent Dive Resort in The Philippines.
Their US Manager Mel Agudo from Stanford Connecticut did lie about payment several to our company.
Marco Vincent Offices
USA Office :
Business Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 403 Wilton, CT 06897
US Toll Free:
1(866)8196165
Philippines Corporate Office :
Unit 503 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V Dela Costa St. cor. Ayala Ave.
Makati City, Philippines
Tel. Nos. (632)813-6329, (632) 813-6812, (632) 813-6806
Telefax: (632)892-0309
Mobile: (63)-920-951-0128
UK Office :
Contact Persons :
Mel Armitage
Trade Winds
35 Elmshott Lane Cippenham Slough SL1 5QS
UK Telephone : 07956 413924
Email Address : tradewind100@aol.com
To: Mel B. Agudo of Mel B. Agudo
CC:Ronald Servidio [ronald@is-isp.net] and CC http://mvdive.blogspot.com/ Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI)
CC: webmaster@tourism.gov.ph
Mr. Agudo,
With all the respect You Mr. Agudo. You are in fault. I did had great image about people of the Philippines and the people.
But You did change that You were not honest to me.
Why did You Lie To Me as the manage/ director of the Marco Vincent Corporation? and did not reply and did not paid?
You did not keep your gentleman promise and our agreement? All small business is base on trust.
Only $200.00
RAQport.com we are small business and we need money to pay our bills and taxes
Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com
Server was never paid to RAQport as promised.
Until the Server is paid to RAQport.com Virginia Company Marco Vincent Dive Resort has no legal right to use the server.
Their manager Mel Agudo from Connecticut office has promised to make the payment and he never did.
As a small business from Virginia I have to collect our money for the advance Web Server Supermicro Hardware.
I know it is not a lot but I do not like when people lie.
Saturday, September 19, 2009
Koniec Tarczy, Iran i odnowa przyjaźni USA-Rosja
Koniec Tarczy, Iran i odnowa przyjaźni USA-Rosja

Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
UpadekTarczy w 70 rocznicę ataku Sowietów na Polskę
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
WWW.pogonowski.com
Upadek projektu wyrzutni amerykańskiego systemu Tarczy dokładnie w 70 rocznicę ataku Sowietów na Polskę jest prawdopodobnie przypadkową zbieżnością. Niemniej warto jest zwrócić uwagę na fakt, że data ataku sowieckiego 17go września 1939 jest mało dyskutowana w Polsce.
Na pytanie, jaka jest prawda? Trzeba sobie przypomnieć, jak z początkiem sierpnia 1939 Czerwona Armia pod dowództwem generała Żukowa dokonała skutecznego ataku na siły japońskie w Mandżurii, w celu likwidacji przeszło dwuletniego frontu sowiecko-japońskiego, co było wówczas osiągalne, wobec zdrady Hitlera paktu Niemiec i Japonii zawartego 25go listopada 1936.
Stalin zaprosił Hitlera do współpracy już w dniu 19 marca 1939, w swoim przemówieniu do 28go zjazdu partii komunistycznej Rosji. Celem Stalina było sprowokowanie Hitlera do zdrady Japonii, z którą Niemcy podpisały traktat przeciwko Rosji. Stało się to z na kilka miesięcy po odrzuceniu przez Polskę, w dniu 26go stycznia, 1939, czteroletnich presji Berlina, żeby Polska przyłączyła się do Niemiec i Japonii w ataku na Związek Sowiecki. Terytorium Polski mogło być bazą druzgoczącego ataku na Rosją albo służyć jak zapora na drodze do budowy 1000 letniego Reichu od Renu do Dniepru, który to Reich z czasem miał być zaludniony wyłącznie przez „rasowych Niemców.”
Najwyraźniej powszechna niewiedza o tych zaszłościach w Polsce jest dowodem, jak wielka jest trudność w wyświetlaniu skomplikowanej prawdy, wypieranej propagandą posługującą się prostymi kłamstwami, lub po prostu zabijanej przemilczaniem faktów nie wygodnych dla Sowietów. W 1939 roku toczyła się, nieznana w Polsce gra między Stalinem i Hitlerem, „kto kogo zmusi do walki na dwa fronty.” Hitler chciał uderzyć na Związek Sowiecki z zachodu i tym samym przyłączyć się do ataków japońskich na Rosję rozpoczętych w 1937go roku.
Odrzucenie przez Polskę paktu z Niemcami, w dniu 26go stycznia, 1939, otworzyło możliwość uwikłania Niemiec na froncie zachodnim we Francji, sprzymierzonej z Polską. Stalin spodziewał się przewlekłej wojny pozycyjnej na linii Maginota i miał nadzieję, że wtedy uda mu się nadrobić brak 44,000 oficerów sowieckich, wymordowanych w czystkach w latach 1930tych. Salin starał się za wszelką cenę odłożyć wojnę z Rosji z Niemcami. Wojna ta była celem życiowym Hitlera, który mówił o Rosji jako o Afryce i uważał Rosjan za murzynów.
Trudno wytłumaczyć brak podstawowych informacji w Polsce na ten temat. Naturalnie Liga Narodów starała się nie dopuścić do wojny do ostatniej chwili. Na te starania przedstawiciela Ligi Narodów, otrzymał on ważną i podstawową wypowiedź Hitlera w dniu 11go sierpnia 1939 roku. Wypowiedź ta była skierowana do Wysokiego Komisarza Ligi Narodów, Jacob’a Burkhardt’a: „Wszystkie moje plany i przedsięwzięcia są skierowane przeciwko Rosji; jeżeli Zachód jest zbyt głupi i ślepy, żeby to pojąć, będę musiał ułożyć się z Rosją, wspólnie pokonać Zachód, a po jego klęsce, zaatakuję Związek Sowiecki, wszystkimi moimi siłami. Konieczna jest mi Ukraina, tak żeby nie mogli mnie wziąć głodem, jak to się stało w ostatniej wojnie.” (Roy Dennan: „Missed Chances,” Indigo, Londyn 1997, str. 65).
Ofensywa sowiecka w sierpniu 1939 na japońską Armię Kwantungu w Mandżuko, pod wodzą generała G. Żukow’a, była pierwszym w historii zastosowaniem taktyk „blitz-krieg’u,” które były wprowadzane przez Niemców i Sowietów na sowieckich poligonach, po zawarciu traktatu w Rapallo, 16go kwietnia, 1922 roku, przez zdominowaną przez Żydów Republikę Weimarską z Sowiecką Rosją.
Stalin starał się uniknąć wojny na dwa fronty i dlatego posłał genarała Żukowa, żeby on niespodzianie uderzył na Japończyków, za pomocą 35 batalionów piechoty, 20 szwadronów kawalerii, 500 samolotów i 500 nowych czołgów. Stalin był świadomy nadchodzącego ataku Niemiec na Polskę. Żukow zaatakował 20go sierpnia, 1939 roku i zadał wielkie straty Japończykom skoordynowanym ogniem czołgów, armat i samolotów, czyli stosując blitz-krieg po raz pierwszy w historii. Ponad 18,000 Japończyków poległo (P. Snow: Nomohan – the Unknown Victory,” History Today, lipiec, 1990).
Według autora Laurie Braber („Chek-mate at the Russian Border: Japanese Conflict before Pearl Harbour” 2000): „Pakt nazistów z Sowietami z 23 sierpnia, 1939, był zdradą Japonii, która atakowała Rosję od 1937 roku. Współpraca Hitlera ze Stalinem była uważna przez rząd Japonii z zdradę Paktu Anty-Kominternowskiego. W konkluzji Japończycy uważali, że Hitlerem trzeba manipulować na korzyść Japonii, ale nigdy mu nie ufać. Natomiast Amerykanie znali tego samego dnia tajne klauzule tego paktu i wiedzą tą nie podzielili się z Polską.
Pakt Niemców ze Sowietami był ogłoszony w czasie klęski wojsk japońskich. Formalnie walki japońsko-sowieckie skończyły się zawieszeniem broni 16go września 1939. Sowieci po zakończeniu walk przeciwko Japonii, 17go września uderzyli na Polskę w pełnej świadomości, że Francja nie spełni obietnicy i nie zaatakuje Niemiec, w czasie, kiedy 70% sił niemieckich walczyło w Polsce, a jednocześnie Francja miała więcej czołgów niż Niemcy.
Z powyższego zestawienia wynika, że odmowa Polski przyłączenia się do ataków Niemiec i Japonii na Rosję, była zbawienna dla Rosji, która stała w obliczu pewnej klęski. Dowódcy rosyjscy dobrze o tym wiedzą, ale boją się przyznać to publicznie i wyrazić wdzięczność Polsce za jej odmowę przyłączenia się do ataku Hitlera na Rosję już w 1939 roku, jak też spowodowanie wypowiedzenia wojny Niemcom przez Francję i Brytanię. Obecnie niewdzięczni Rosjanie rozpisują się o braku wdzięczności Polaków za wypędzenie Niemców z Polski i narzucenie Polsce jarzma sowieckiego, które stworzyło w Rosji archipelag gułagu.
WWW.pogonowski.com
Koniec planów budowy w Polsce wyrzutni amerykańskich „Tarczy” z powodu oficjalnej oceny, że faktycznie od początku było nonsensem opowiadać o zagrożeniu Nowego Jorku przez pociski nuklearne Iranu, ma obecnie rozmaite skutki. Przez całe lata trwała propaganda żydowska, że Iran jest zagrożeniem bytu Izraela i dlatego musi być poskromiony. Z powodu tej propagandy ekstremistom-syjonistom udawało się przesadnie przypisywać Iranowi znacznie większe możliwości wojskowe, niż Iran faktycznie ma i w ten sposób dodawać Iranowi regionalnego prestiżu, który maleje wobec likwidacji, zwariowanego planu budowy wyrzutni pocisków Tarczy o kilka minut lotu od Moskwy.
Polska nie tylko straciła prestiż pochopnym podpisywaniem się pod projektem Tarczy, ale jednocześnie naraziła się skreślenie przez Moskwę miliardowych kontraktów na żywność. Kontrakty te zostały przejęte przez innych członków NATO. Natomiast Polska nie dostanie żadnej kompensaty za swoje straty podobnie jak nie otrzymała żadnego udziału w kontraktach na odbudowę Iraku.
Plan Tarcz był nie do wykonania, ponieważ od dawna panuje uznawany przez Waszyngton i Moskwę fakt „obopólnego wzajemnego zniszczenia” na wypadek wymiany salw nuklearnych przez USA i Rosję. Dobrze posumował tą sytuację prezes prestiżowego instytutu CATO w Waszyngtonie, profesor Carpinter w artykule „Granice Odstraszania” („Limits of Deterrance”), w którym autor wyjaśnia, dlaczego wszystkie obietnice obrony przez USA dawane około stu państwom i państewkom nie, mają żadnej wartości i naprawdę są tyle warte, co czeki bez pokrycia.
Naturalnie dla Polski jest bez porównania lepiej, że nie będzie w regionie Kaliningradu-Królewca wyrzutni rakiet z głowicami nuklearnymi typu „Iskander,” ale niepotrzebnie rząd polski dał się nabrać na udzielanie pomocy USA w fikcyjnej obronie Nowego Jorku przez rakietami Iranu w ramach gry wynikłej z „Koszmaru Izraela z powodu możliwej utraty monopolu nuklearnego na Bliskim Wschodzie,” jak o tym niedawno było w gazecie Haaretz w Jerozolimie.
Wszystko jedno, jakie zapewnienia daje Moskwa Iranowi, że nie zrobi zakulisowego geszeftu z Waszyngtonem, Teheran czuje się zaniepokojony. Szerzy się opinia, że decyzja prezydenta Obamy likwidacji Tarczy jest bardzo dobrze widziana w Moskwie, która może być mniej oporna w sprawie pożądanych przez Izrael sankcji przeciwko Iranowi. Od początku Rosja stała na stanowisku, że Tarcza w Polsce zagrażała ośrodkom dowodzenia i kontroli w Moskwie.
Uzasadnienie decyzji prezydenta Obamy o likwidacji Tarczy bardzo zmniejszyło prestiż regionalny Iranu w chwili, kiedy ogłoszono zmianę oceny Iranu przez USA i konkluzję, że Iran nie przedstawia żadnego wiarogodnego zagrożenia Nowego Jorku za pomocą pocisków nuklearnych dalekiego zasięgu. Jednocześnie Iran nie zajmował nigdy wrogiego stanowiska wobec Europu i wręcz przeciwnie chciałby konkurować z Rosją w dostawach do Europy gazu ziemnego i ropy naftowej, ale nie jest w stanie tego robić w czasie, kiedy musi korzystać z poparcia Rosji, przeciwko polityce osi USA-Izrael.
Iran nigdy nie pogwałcił warunków traktatu o nie-rozpowszechnianiu broni nuklearnych, który podpisał. Obecnie zmiany wymuszone przez rząd Bush-Cheney’a na ONZcie stawiają warunki inne wobec Iranu niż takich państw jak Niemcy lub Japonia. Oba te państwa mają prawo wzbogacania uranu w celu produkcji elektryczności na warunkach obecnie zabronionych Iranowi. Naturalnie duma narodowa Iranu karze Teheranowi domagać się takich samych warunków, z jakich korzystają inne państwa.
Poprawa stosunków Waszyngtonu z Moskwą może doprowadzić do postępu w rokowaniach dotyczących zmniejszania arsenałów nuklearnych na świecie, zwłaszcza w USA i w Rosji. Ciekawe, jak będzie traktowana sprawa pokaźnego arsenału nuklearnego Izraela, o którym prasa cenzurowana przez Żydów milczy, ale tacy ludzie jak były prezydent USA, Jimmy Carter różnie oceniają arsenał nuklearny Izraela od stu do stu pięćdziesięciu bomb gotowych do użytku.
Na marginesie można wspomnieć, że politolog w Izraelu odgrażał się na Internecie, że jeżeli Europa pozwoli na zniszczenie Izraela przez Arabów to, tak jak legendarny Samson, Izrael zabierze ze sobą, czyli zniszczy bombami nuklearnymi stolice Europy począwszy od Rzymu, najbardziej znienawidzonego w tradycji Talmudu. Tymczasem poprawa stosunków USA-Rosja prawdopodobnie będzie proporcjonalna do osłabiania poparcia Rosji dla Iranu.
Likwidacja Tarczy ma miejsce na tydzień przed „prywatnym” spotkaniem w Nowym Jorku prezydenta Barak’a Hussein’a Obamu z prezydentem Rosji, Dymitrym Miedwiediewem z okazji ogólnego zebrania Narodów Zjednoczonych. Natomiast sekretarz generalny NATO Anders Foch Rasmussen nawoływał do „otwartego jak nigdy” dialogu z Rosją w celu zmniejszenia napięć w Europie i stawienia wspólnego z Rosją oporu przeciwko wspólnym zagrożeniom oraz zapowiedział, że przewodniczący NATO pojadą do Moskwy, żeby poradzić się jaki powinien być rozwój strategii NATO na przyszłość.
Rasmussen powiedział „Chcemy dialogu z Rosją i chcemy wysłuchać, jakie stanowisko i wymagania mają Rosjanie, tak żeby stworzyć prawdziwe strategiczne partnerstwo NATO-Rosja w Afganistanie i w zwalczaniu terroryzmu i korsarstwa.” Obiecał on, że NATO zawsze będzie szanować bezpieczeństwo Rosji i jest gotów na rokowania spraw nowej struktury bezpieczeństwa Europy proponowanego przez Miedwiediewa. Mimo tych zabiegów Rosja nadal jest przeciwna jakimkolwiek sankcjom ONZ przeciwko Iranowi i twierdzi, że plany Tarczy były błędne od początku i dopiero kryzys ekonomiczny spowodował ich wycofanie przez USA.
Na początku września 2009 Rosja podpisała gwarancje obrony Abhazji i Osetii w zamian za bazy na ich terenie, takie jak w porcie Gudauta na Morzu Czarnym, na wypadek gdyby pro-USA rząd w Kijowie utrudniał operację rosyjską w Sewastopolu na Krymie. Rosja nie pozwoli żeby obrócić Morze Czarne w „jeziorko należące do NATO.”
Mimo zapaści demograficznej Rosja uważa USA za więdnącą potęgę i uważa że ogniskowa polityki światowej zmierza na wschód do Azji. Waszyngton chce uzyskać pomoc Rosji przeciwko Afganistanowi i Iranowi, ale nadal prowadzi swoją politykę wobec Ukrainy i Gruzji. Prawdopodobnie prezydent Obama włączy likwidację planów Tarczy do nowej fazy „zaczynania na nowo od początku lepszych stosunków USA z Rosją.”

Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
UpadekTarczy w 70 rocznicę ataku Sowietów na Polskę
Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski
WWW.pogonowski.com
Upadek projektu wyrzutni amerykańskiego systemu Tarczy dokładnie w 70 rocznicę ataku Sowietów na Polskę jest prawdopodobnie przypadkową zbieżnością. Niemniej warto jest zwrócić uwagę na fakt, że data ataku sowieckiego 17go września 1939 jest mało dyskutowana w Polsce.
Na pytanie, jaka jest prawda? Trzeba sobie przypomnieć, jak z początkiem sierpnia 1939 Czerwona Armia pod dowództwem generała Żukowa dokonała skutecznego ataku na siły japońskie w Mandżurii, w celu likwidacji przeszło dwuletniego frontu sowiecko-japońskiego, co było wówczas osiągalne, wobec zdrady Hitlera paktu Niemiec i Japonii zawartego 25go listopada 1936.
Stalin zaprosił Hitlera do współpracy już w dniu 19 marca 1939, w swoim przemówieniu do 28go zjazdu partii komunistycznej Rosji. Celem Stalina było sprowokowanie Hitlera do zdrady Japonii, z którą Niemcy podpisały traktat przeciwko Rosji. Stało się to z na kilka miesięcy po odrzuceniu przez Polskę, w dniu 26go stycznia, 1939, czteroletnich presji Berlina, żeby Polska przyłączyła się do Niemiec i Japonii w ataku na Związek Sowiecki. Terytorium Polski mogło być bazą druzgoczącego ataku na Rosją albo służyć jak zapora na drodze do budowy 1000 letniego Reichu od Renu do Dniepru, który to Reich z czasem miał być zaludniony wyłącznie przez „rasowych Niemców.”
Najwyraźniej powszechna niewiedza o tych zaszłościach w Polsce jest dowodem, jak wielka jest trudność w wyświetlaniu skomplikowanej prawdy, wypieranej propagandą posługującą się prostymi kłamstwami, lub po prostu zabijanej przemilczaniem faktów nie wygodnych dla Sowietów. W 1939 roku toczyła się, nieznana w Polsce gra między Stalinem i Hitlerem, „kto kogo zmusi do walki na dwa fronty.” Hitler chciał uderzyć na Związek Sowiecki z zachodu i tym samym przyłączyć się do ataków japońskich na Rosję rozpoczętych w 1937go roku.
Odrzucenie przez Polskę paktu z Niemcami, w dniu 26go stycznia, 1939, otworzyło możliwość uwikłania Niemiec na froncie zachodnim we Francji, sprzymierzonej z Polską. Stalin spodziewał się przewlekłej wojny pozycyjnej na linii Maginota i miał nadzieję, że wtedy uda mu się nadrobić brak 44,000 oficerów sowieckich, wymordowanych w czystkach w latach 1930tych. Salin starał się za wszelką cenę odłożyć wojnę z Rosji z Niemcami. Wojna ta była celem życiowym Hitlera, który mówił o Rosji jako o Afryce i uważał Rosjan za murzynów.
Trudno wytłumaczyć brak podstawowych informacji w Polsce na ten temat. Naturalnie Liga Narodów starała się nie dopuścić do wojny do ostatniej chwili. Na te starania przedstawiciela Ligi Narodów, otrzymał on ważną i podstawową wypowiedź Hitlera w dniu 11go sierpnia 1939 roku. Wypowiedź ta była skierowana do Wysokiego Komisarza Ligi Narodów, Jacob’a Burkhardt’a: „Wszystkie moje plany i przedsięwzięcia są skierowane przeciwko Rosji; jeżeli Zachód jest zbyt głupi i ślepy, żeby to pojąć, będę musiał ułożyć się z Rosją, wspólnie pokonać Zachód, a po jego klęsce, zaatakuję Związek Sowiecki, wszystkimi moimi siłami. Konieczna jest mi Ukraina, tak żeby nie mogli mnie wziąć głodem, jak to się stało w ostatniej wojnie.” (Roy Dennan: „Missed Chances,” Indigo, Londyn 1997, str. 65).
Ofensywa sowiecka w sierpniu 1939 na japońską Armię Kwantungu w Mandżuko, pod wodzą generała G. Żukow’a, była pierwszym w historii zastosowaniem taktyk „blitz-krieg’u,” które były wprowadzane przez Niemców i Sowietów na sowieckich poligonach, po zawarciu traktatu w Rapallo, 16go kwietnia, 1922 roku, przez zdominowaną przez Żydów Republikę Weimarską z Sowiecką Rosją.
Stalin starał się uniknąć wojny na dwa fronty i dlatego posłał genarała Żukowa, żeby on niespodzianie uderzył na Japończyków, za pomocą 35 batalionów piechoty, 20 szwadronów kawalerii, 500 samolotów i 500 nowych czołgów. Stalin był świadomy nadchodzącego ataku Niemiec na Polskę. Żukow zaatakował 20go sierpnia, 1939 roku i zadał wielkie straty Japończykom skoordynowanym ogniem czołgów, armat i samolotów, czyli stosując blitz-krieg po raz pierwszy w historii. Ponad 18,000 Japończyków poległo (P. Snow: Nomohan – the Unknown Victory,” History Today, lipiec, 1990).
Według autora Laurie Braber („Chek-mate at the Russian Border: Japanese Conflict before Pearl Harbour” 2000): „Pakt nazistów z Sowietami z 23 sierpnia, 1939, był zdradą Japonii, która atakowała Rosję od 1937 roku. Współpraca Hitlera ze Stalinem była uważna przez rząd Japonii z zdradę Paktu Anty-Kominternowskiego. W konkluzji Japończycy uważali, że Hitlerem trzeba manipulować na korzyść Japonii, ale nigdy mu nie ufać. Natomiast Amerykanie znali tego samego dnia tajne klauzule tego paktu i wiedzą tą nie podzielili się z Polską.
Pakt Niemców ze Sowietami był ogłoszony w czasie klęski wojsk japońskich. Formalnie walki japońsko-sowieckie skończyły się zawieszeniem broni 16go września 1939. Sowieci po zakończeniu walk przeciwko Japonii, 17go września uderzyli na Polskę w pełnej świadomości, że Francja nie spełni obietnicy i nie zaatakuje Niemiec, w czasie, kiedy 70% sił niemieckich walczyło w Polsce, a jednocześnie Francja miała więcej czołgów niż Niemcy.
Z powyższego zestawienia wynika, że odmowa Polski przyłączenia się do ataków Niemiec i Japonii na Rosję, była zbawienna dla Rosji, która stała w obliczu pewnej klęski. Dowódcy rosyjscy dobrze o tym wiedzą, ale boją się przyznać to publicznie i wyrazić wdzięczność Polsce za jej odmowę przyłączenia się do ataku Hitlera na Rosję już w 1939 roku, jak też spowodowanie wypowiedzenia wojny Niemcom przez Francję i Brytanię. Obecnie niewdzięczni Rosjanie rozpisują się o braku wdzięczności Polaków za wypędzenie Niemców z Polski i narzucenie Polsce jarzma sowieckiego, które stworzyło w Rosji archipelag gułagu.
WWW.pogonowski.com
Koniec planów budowy w Polsce wyrzutni amerykańskich „Tarczy” z powodu oficjalnej oceny, że faktycznie od początku było nonsensem opowiadać o zagrożeniu Nowego Jorku przez pociski nuklearne Iranu, ma obecnie rozmaite skutki. Przez całe lata trwała propaganda żydowska, że Iran jest zagrożeniem bytu Izraela i dlatego musi być poskromiony. Z powodu tej propagandy ekstremistom-syjonistom udawało się przesadnie przypisywać Iranowi znacznie większe możliwości wojskowe, niż Iran faktycznie ma i w ten sposób dodawać Iranowi regionalnego prestiżu, który maleje wobec likwidacji, zwariowanego planu budowy wyrzutni pocisków Tarczy o kilka minut lotu od Moskwy.
Polska nie tylko straciła prestiż pochopnym podpisywaniem się pod projektem Tarczy, ale jednocześnie naraziła się skreślenie przez Moskwę miliardowych kontraktów na żywność. Kontrakty te zostały przejęte przez innych członków NATO. Natomiast Polska nie dostanie żadnej kompensaty za swoje straty podobnie jak nie otrzymała żadnego udziału w kontraktach na odbudowę Iraku.
Plan Tarcz był nie do wykonania, ponieważ od dawna panuje uznawany przez Waszyngton i Moskwę fakt „obopólnego wzajemnego zniszczenia” na wypadek wymiany salw nuklearnych przez USA i Rosję. Dobrze posumował tą sytuację prezes prestiżowego instytutu CATO w Waszyngtonie, profesor Carpinter w artykule „Granice Odstraszania” („Limits of Deterrance”), w którym autor wyjaśnia, dlaczego wszystkie obietnice obrony przez USA dawane około stu państwom i państewkom nie, mają żadnej wartości i naprawdę są tyle warte, co czeki bez pokrycia.
Naturalnie dla Polski jest bez porównania lepiej, że nie będzie w regionie Kaliningradu-Królewca wyrzutni rakiet z głowicami nuklearnymi typu „Iskander,” ale niepotrzebnie rząd polski dał się nabrać na udzielanie pomocy USA w fikcyjnej obronie Nowego Jorku przez rakietami Iranu w ramach gry wynikłej z „Koszmaru Izraela z powodu możliwej utraty monopolu nuklearnego na Bliskim Wschodzie,” jak o tym niedawno było w gazecie Haaretz w Jerozolimie.
Wszystko jedno, jakie zapewnienia daje Moskwa Iranowi, że nie zrobi zakulisowego geszeftu z Waszyngtonem, Teheran czuje się zaniepokojony. Szerzy się opinia, że decyzja prezydenta Obamy likwidacji Tarczy jest bardzo dobrze widziana w Moskwie, która może być mniej oporna w sprawie pożądanych przez Izrael sankcji przeciwko Iranowi. Od początku Rosja stała na stanowisku, że Tarcza w Polsce zagrażała ośrodkom dowodzenia i kontroli w Moskwie.
Uzasadnienie decyzji prezydenta Obamy o likwidacji Tarczy bardzo zmniejszyło prestiż regionalny Iranu w chwili, kiedy ogłoszono zmianę oceny Iranu przez USA i konkluzję, że Iran nie przedstawia żadnego wiarogodnego zagrożenia Nowego Jorku za pomocą pocisków nuklearnych dalekiego zasięgu. Jednocześnie Iran nie zajmował nigdy wrogiego stanowiska wobec Europu i wręcz przeciwnie chciałby konkurować z Rosją w dostawach do Europy gazu ziemnego i ropy naftowej, ale nie jest w stanie tego robić w czasie, kiedy musi korzystać z poparcia Rosji, przeciwko polityce osi USA-Izrael.
Iran nigdy nie pogwałcił warunków traktatu o nie-rozpowszechnianiu broni nuklearnych, który podpisał. Obecnie zmiany wymuszone przez rząd Bush-Cheney’a na ONZcie stawiają warunki inne wobec Iranu niż takich państw jak Niemcy lub Japonia. Oba te państwa mają prawo wzbogacania uranu w celu produkcji elektryczności na warunkach obecnie zabronionych Iranowi. Naturalnie duma narodowa Iranu karze Teheranowi domagać się takich samych warunków, z jakich korzystają inne państwa.
Poprawa stosunków Waszyngtonu z Moskwą może doprowadzić do postępu w rokowaniach dotyczących zmniejszania arsenałów nuklearnych na świecie, zwłaszcza w USA i w Rosji. Ciekawe, jak będzie traktowana sprawa pokaźnego arsenału nuklearnego Izraela, o którym prasa cenzurowana przez Żydów milczy, ale tacy ludzie jak były prezydent USA, Jimmy Carter różnie oceniają arsenał nuklearny Izraela od stu do stu pięćdziesięciu bomb gotowych do użytku.
Na marginesie można wspomnieć, że politolog w Izraelu odgrażał się na Internecie, że jeżeli Europa pozwoli na zniszczenie Izraela przez Arabów to, tak jak legendarny Samson, Izrael zabierze ze sobą, czyli zniszczy bombami nuklearnymi stolice Europy począwszy od Rzymu, najbardziej znienawidzonego w tradycji Talmudu. Tymczasem poprawa stosunków USA-Rosja prawdopodobnie będzie proporcjonalna do osłabiania poparcia Rosji dla Iranu.
Likwidacja Tarczy ma miejsce na tydzień przed „prywatnym” spotkaniem w Nowym Jorku prezydenta Barak’a Hussein’a Obamu z prezydentem Rosji, Dymitrym Miedwiediewem z okazji ogólnego zebrania Narodów Zjednoczonych. Natomiast sekretarz generalny NATO Anders Foch Rasmussen nawoływał do „otwartego jak nigdy” dialogu z Rosją w celu zmniejszenia napięć w Europie i stawienia wspólnego z Rosją oporu przeciwko wspólnym zagrożeniom oraz zapowiedział, że przewodniczący NATO pojadą do Moskwy, żeby poradzić się jaki powinien być rozwój strategii NATO na przyszłość.
Rasmussen powiedział „Chcemy dialogu z Rosją i chcemy wysłuchać, jakie stanowisko i wymagania mają Rosjanie, tak żeby stworzyć prawdziwe strategiczne partnerstwo NATO-Rosja w Afganistanie i w zwalczaniu terroryzmu i korsarstwa.” Obiecał on, że NATO zawsze będzie szanować bezpieczeństwo Rosji i jest gotów na rokowania spraw nowej struktury bezpieczeństwa Europy proponowanego przez Miedwiediewa. Mimo tych zabiegów Rosja nadal jest przeciwna jakimkolwiek sankcjom ONZ przeciwko Iranowi i twierdzi, że plany Tarczy były błędne od początku i dopiero kryzys ekonomiczny spowodował ich wycofanie przez USA.
Na początku września 2009 Rosja podpisała gwarancje obrony Abhazji i Osetii w zamian za bazy na ich terenie, takie jak w porcie Gudauta na Morzu Czarnym, na wypadek gdyby pro-USA rząd w Kijowie utrudniał operację rosyjską w Sewastopolu na Krymie. Rosja nie pozwoli żeby obrócić Morze Czarne w „jeziorko należące do NATO.”
Mimo zapaści demograficznej Rosja uważa USA za więdnącą potęgę i uważa że ogniskowa polityki światowej zmierza na wschód do Azji. Waszyngton chce uzyskać pomoc Rosji przeciwko Afganistanowi i Iranowi, ale nadal prowadzi swoją politykę wobec Ukrainy i Gruzji. Prawdopodobnie prezydent Obama włączy likwidację planów Tarczy do nowej fazy „zaczynania na nowo od początku lepszych stosunków USA z Rosją.”
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Prince George's Community College Largo Maryland just deployed RAQport.com Servers and Cluster/Virtualization Software well-established technology.
Prince George's Community College Largo Maryland just deployed RAQport.com Servers and Cluster/Virtualization Software well-established technology.



Prince George's Community College Largo Maryland just deployed RAQport.com Servers and Cluster/Virtualization Software well-established technology.
Virtualization of the IT back room has already helped enterprises simplify, consolidate, and realize new flexibility and performance in server farms, data storage, and networks. According to IDC, some 75 percent of enterprises employ virtualization technology in production processes, indicating its widespread acceptance. However, IT managers continue to feel pressure to reduce even further the costs of IT infrastructure and to increase the ROI—the value—of IT spending by expanding its use to the entire enterprise technology toolset
Please let me know if you need any new software for Centos BlueQuartz, Blueonyx, SUN COBALT RAQ LINE: spam filter, firewall, awstats, openmail, PHPMYSQL phpMyAdmin, webmin and more
or any new SuperMicro Hardware Servers loaded with latest updated OS starting $799.00
Server GUI is in German/Deutsch, Danish, Japanese and English.
SHIPPING Worldwide around $35.00 in US and $145.00 to EU
We have all sell the Spare Parts for the SUN COBALT RAQ LINE: cooling fans, CPU, RAM, Mainboards,Hard Drives, Barebones with LCD and more.
Please check the Server Virtualization and Cluster Software and new Blueonyx Server Centos 5.3 with Sun Cobalt GUI
http://www.raqport.com/store/merchant.mvc
software:
http://www.raqport.com/store/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=R&Category_Code=blueonyxsoft
New Super Servers from SuperMicro
SUPERMICRO 5015M-T 2 GIG RAM DUAL500GB SATA RAID CPU 3.2GHZ DUAL 500GB SATA RAID HOT SWAP HD'S
SUPERMICRO 5015M-T 2 GIG RAM DUAL500GB SATA RAID CPU 3.2GHZ DUAL 500GB SATA RAID HOT SWAP HD'S
Code: SUPERMICRO5015M-T
Price: $999.00
Rackable Systems 1U Server P4 2.66ghz / 2gb / 500gb special $499.00
special
- CD OS Restore included FREE SHIPPING IN US , INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING APPLY BASE ON THE LOCATION
CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance is built on the community version of Redhat Enterprise Linux called Centos.
RAQport ships all the systems listed below worldwide.
This server appliance uses CentOS as operating system. As GUI interface it uses BlueQuartz, which is based on the open sourced RaQ550 Sausalito architecture from Sun Cobalt.
Sites, users, mailing lists and settings can directly be imported with the built in CMU from any Cobalt RaQ. So this is an inexpensive way to trade the aging Cobalt RaQs against much more modern hard- and software, while retaining the well known functionality and GUI interface.
A CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance can do everything a RaQ550 and it does it much faster. A CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance can do all including Frontpage. We do not have Chilisoft ASP at this moment ) - The serial ATA hardisks have a throughput of approximately 50 MBit/seconds and even the basic model with a 2.8GHz CPU outperforms a RaQ550 by several magnitudes.
Aside from the speed there are other compelling reasons to consider replacing existing RaQ3, RaQ4, XTR and RaQ550 with a CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance
The sudden demise of the Sun Cobalt RaQ has left ISPs and hosting companies with a time bomb: hundreds of thousands of RaQ servers worldwide starting to wear out – with no viable replacement. Fortunately, Linux specialists have the answer.
We still have over 100 units of the SUN COBALT RAQ 2 RAQ 3 RAQ 4 RAQ 550 RAQ XTR and Qubes.
In short:
* It is "BlueQuartz" on CentOS 5.3 and then some.
* Has previously commercial add ons pre-installed, including ...
* phpMyAdmin
* Web based Email
* GUI to automatically create and remove MySQL users and databases for sites.
* Subdomain management
* Better PHP security management on a per site basis.
* New default skin for the GUI.
* Working vacation messages.
* Updated Dovecot and ProFTPd.
* JSP support already built in with an improved GUI.
* YUM updates are delivered through various mirrors right from the start.
* Is still available free of charge and released under Sun modified BDS license.
* Comes with PHP5 and MySQL5 preinstalled.
* GUI to modify SSHd settings (root access, port, protocols)
* GUI available in English, German, Danish and Japanese.
If you still need RAQ3 AND RAQ4 we have over 100 Units we can preeload the Strongbolt Centos BlueQuartz OS prices start with $79.00 OS Restore Included
Alex Lech Bajan
Sincerely,
RAQport Inc.
2004 North Monroe Street
Arlington Virginia 22207
Washington DC Area
USA
TEL: 703-528-0114
TEL2: 703-652-0993
Fax Number: 571-482-3771
sms: 703-485-6619
Toll Free:1800-695-6200
EMAIL: sales@raqport.com
WEB SITE: http://raqport.com
Replacement for the SUN COBALT RAQ LINE New Centos BluQuartz Virtualization and Cluster Web Servers
What is Aventurin{e}?
Aventurin{e} is a fully blown Linux operating system that can be installed on any X86 compatible hardware. It provides an intuitive browser based administration interface and allows to create and manage Linux based virtual private servers. Aventurin{e} also includes mechanisms to back up and restore virtual private servers.
Benefits:
Aventurin{e} is ideal for webhosting companies and companies with their own IT infrastructure.
Within a matter of minutes you can create new CentOS + BlueQuartz virtual private servers which cater all your web, email and FTP needs.
Or you can create that CentOS, Fedora Core, Debian, Ubuntu or OpenSuSE virtual private server that your developer needs to deploy his new application. Aventurin{e} also helps you to deploy your own customized Linux operating systems.
Additionally Aventurin{e} helps you to improve your ability for disaster recovery. No longer do you have to provide individual backup mechanisms for each of your servers. Aventurin{e} allows you to back up (and restore!) all its virtual private servers through the GUI interface.
Migrations of virtual private servers from Aventurin{e} - or from any OpenVZ or Virtuozzo host - to another can be done without downtime.
Redundancy:
For those that need high availability and redundancy: Aventurin{e} can do that as well. It is also available in a clustering version which will make sure that your important servers and services are always reachable.
Aventurin{e} downloadable ISO image - details:
Aventurin{e} is available in two different versions:
Aventurin{e} - Standard
Aventurin{e} - Clustering
Both versions allow you to create, administer and run multiple virtual private servers (i.e.: "VPS") on the same hardware (i.e.: "master node").
To run Aventurin{e} you just need a good server which has plenty of RAM. CPU power sure is helpful, but RAM helps quite a bit more.
Hardware requirements:
What kind of hardware you need for Aventurin{e} of course depends on the expected usage. If you just want to run a few low traffic virtual servers, then your hardware can be older and less powerful, as if you run CPU and RAM intensive tasks on many high traffic virtual servers.
This is what we consider the minimum hardware requirements:
IntelC Pentium 4 with 2.0 GHz (or similar AMDC CPU)
1 Gig of RAM
1x100 Gigabyte harddisk
Intermediate hardware requirements:
IntelC Pentium 4 D6XX with 2.4-3.2 GHz (or similar AMDC CPU)
2 Gig of RAM
2x250 Gigabyte harddisks
Recommended hardware requirements for troublefree operations under most adverse situations:
IntelC Core2Duo E6600 2.4GHz (or better)
4-8 Gig of RAM
2x500 Gigabyte harddisks.
For clustering your server should have two network interfaces. One of them - at least - should ideally be a Gigabit Ethernet interface.
Included OS templates:
The ISO images of Aventurin{e} comes with the following OS templates
included:
CentOS + BlueQuartz v4.8 (NuOnce build) CentOS v4/Final (minimal install) Debian v3.1 (minimal install) Fedora Core v5 (minimal install)
OS templates available through YUM:
Additional OS templates are available on the Aventurin{e} update repository and can be installed with the command "yum install ". The following OS templates are currently available this way (more will be added later):
CentOS v4 (default install)
CentOS v5 (minimal install)
CentOS v5 (default install)
Debian v4 (minimal install)
Fedora Core v5 (default install)
Fedora Core v6 (default install)
Fedora Core v7 (minimal install)
Fedora Core v7 (default install)
Fedora Core v8 (minimal install)
Fedora Core v8 (default install)
OpenSuse v10 (default install)
Ubuntu v6.06 (minimal install)
Open-Xchange 0.8.6 (Community Edition) OS template



Prince George's Community College Largo Maryland just deployed RAQport.com Servers and Cluster/Virtualization Software well-established technology.
Virtualization of the IT back room has already helped enterprises simplify, consolidate, and realize new flexibility and performance in server farms, data storage, and networks. According to IDC, some 75 percent of enterprises employ virtualization technology in production processes, indicating its widespread acceptance. However, IT managers continue to feel pressure to reduce even further the costs of IT infrastructure and to increase the ROI—the value—of IT spending by expanding its use to the entire enterprise technology toolset
Please let me know if you need any new software for Centos BlueQuartz, Blueonyx, SUN COBALT RAQ LINE: spam filter, firewall, awstats, openmail, PHPMYSQL phpMyAdmin, webmin and more
or any new SuperMicro Hardware Servers loaded with latest updated OS starting $799.00
Server GUI is in German/Deutsch, Danish, Japanese and English.
SHIPPING Worldwide around $35.00 in US and $145.00 to EU
We have all sell the Spare Parts for the SUN COBALT RAQ LINE: cooling fans, CPU, RAM, Mainboards,Hard Drives, Barebones with LCD and more.
Please check the Server Virtualization and Cluster Software and new Blueonyx Server Centos 5.3 with Sun Cobalt GUI
http://www.raqport.com/store/merchant.mvc
software:
http://www.raqport.com/store/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=R&Category_Code=blueonyxsoft
New Super Servers from SuperMicro
SUPERMICRO 5015M-T 2 GIG RAM DUAL500GB SATA RAID CPU 3.2GHZ DUAL 500GB SATA RAID HOT SWAP HD'S
SUPERMICRO 5015M-T 2 GIG RAM DUAL500GB SATA RAID CPU 3.2GHZ DUAL 500GB SATA RAID HOT SWAP HD'S
Code: SUPERMICRO5015M-T
Price: $999.00
Rackable Systems 1U Server P4 2.66ghz / 2gb / 500gb special $499.00
special
- CD OS Restore included FREE SHIPPING IN US , INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING APPLY BASE ON THE LOCATION
CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance is built on the community version of Redhat Enterprise Linux called Centos.
RAQport ships all the systems listed below worldwide.
This server appliance uses CentOS as operating system. As GUI interface it uses BlueQuartz, which is based on the open sourced RaQ550 Sausalito architecture from Sun Cobalt.
Sites, users, mailing lists and settings can directly be imported with the built in CMU from any Cobalt RaQ. So this is an inexpensive way to trade the aging Cobalt RaQs against much more modern hard- and software, while retaining the well known functionality and GUI interface.
A CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance can do everything a RaQ550 and it does it much faster. A CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance can do all including Frontpage. We do not have Chilisoft ASP at this moment ) - The serial ATA hardisks have a throughput of approximately 50 MBit/seconds and even the basic model with a 2.8GHz CPU outperforms a RaQ550 by several magnitudes.
Aside from the speed there are other compelling reasons to consider replacing existing RaQ3, RaQ4, XTR and RaQ550 with a CentOS + BlueQuartz Server Appliance
The sudden demise of the Sun Cobalt RaQ has left ISPs and hosting companies with a time bomb: hundreds of thousands of RaQ servers worldwide starting to wear out – with no viable replacement. Fortunately, Linux specialists have the answer.
We still have over 100 units of the SUN COBALT RAQ 2 RAQ 3 RAQ 4 RAQ 550 RAQ XTR and Qubes.
In short:
* It is "BlueQuartz" on CentOS 5.3 and then some.
* Has previously commercial add ons pre-installed, including ...
* phpMyAdmin
* Web based Email
* GUI to automatically create and remove MySQL users and databases for sites.
* Subdomain management
* Better PHP security management on a per site basis.
* New default skin for the GUI.
* Working vacation messages.
* Updated Dovecot and ProFTPd.
* JSP support already built in with an improved GUI.
* YUM updates are delivered through various mirrors right from the start.
* Is still available free of charge and released under Sun modified BDS license.
* Comes with PHP5 and MySQL5 preinstalled.
* GUI to modify SSHd settings (root access, port, protocols)
* GUI available in English, German, Danish and Japanese.
If you still need RAQ3 AND RAQ4 we have over 100 Units we can preeload the Strongbolt Centos BlueQuartz OS prices start with $79.00 OS Restore Included
Alex Lech Bajan
Sincerely,
RAQport Inc.
2004 North Monroe Street
Arlington Virginia 22207
Washington DC Area
USA
TEL: 703-528-0114
TEL2: 703-652-0993
Fax Number: 571-482-3771
sms: 703-485-6619
Toll Free:1800-695-6200
EMAIL: sales@raqport.com
WEB SITE: http://raqport.com
Replacement for the SUN COBALT RAQ LINE New Centos BluQuartz Virtualization and Cluster Web Servers
What is Aventurin{e}?
Aventurin{e} is a fully blown Linux operating system that can be installed on any X86 compatible hardware. It provides an intuitive browser based administration interface and allows to create and manage Linux based virtual private servers. Aventurin{e} also includes mechanisms to back up and restore virtual private servers.
Benefits:
Aventurin{e} is ideal for webhosting companies and companies with their own IT infrastructure.
Within a matter of minutes you can create new CentOS + BlueQuartz virtual private servers which cater all your web, email and FTP needs.
Or you can create that CentOS, Fedora Core, Debian, Ubuntu or OpenSuSE virtual private server that your developer needs to deploy his new application. Aventurin{e} also helps you to deploy your own customized Linux operating systems.
Additionally Aventurin{e} helps you to improve your ability for disaster recovery. No longer do you have to provide individual backup mechanisms for each of your servers. Aventurin{e} allows you to back up (and restore!) all its virtual private servers through the GUI interface.
Migrations of virtual private servers from Aventurin{e} - or from any OpenVZ or Virtuozzo host - to another can be done without downtime.
Redundancy:
For those that need high availability and redundancy: Aventurin{e} can do that as well. It is also available in a clustering version which will make sure that your important servers and services are always reachable.
Aventurin{e} downloadable ISO image - details:
Aventurin{e} is available in two different versions:
Aventurin{e} - Standard
Aventurin{e} - Clustering
Both versions allow you to create, administer and run multiple virtual private servers (i.e.: "VPS") on the same hardware (i.e.: "master node").
To run Aventurin{e} you just need a good server which has plenty of RAM. CPU power sure is helpful, but RAM helps quite a bit more.
Hardware requirements:
What kind of hardware you need for Aventurin{e} of course depends on the expected usage. If you just want to run a few low traffic virtual servers, then your hardware can be older and less powerful, as if you run CPU and RAM intensive tasks on many high traffic virtual servers.
This is what we consider the minimum hardware requirements:
IntelC Pentium 4 with 2.0 GHz (or similar AMDC CPU)
1 Gig of RAM
1x100 Gigabyte harddisk
Intermediate hardware requirements:
IntelC Pentium 4 D6XX with 2.4-3.2 GHz (or similar AMDC CPU)
2 Gig of RAM
2x250 Gigabyte harddisks
Recommended hardware requirements for troublefree operations under most adverse situations:
IntelC Core2Duo E6600 2.4GHz (or better)
4-8 Gig of RAM
2x500 Gigabyte harddisks.
For clustering your server should have two network interfaces. One of them - at least - should ideally be a Gigabit Ethernet interface.
Included OS templates:
The ISO images of Aventurin{e} comes with the following OS templates
included:
CentOS + BlueQuartz v4.8 (NuOnce build) CentOS v4/Final (minimal install) Debian v3.1 (minimal install) Fedora Core v5 (minimal install)
OS templates available through YUM:
Additional OS templates are available on the Aventurin{e} update repository and can be installed with the command "yum install ". The following OS templates are currently available this way (more will be added later):
CentOS v4 (default install)
CentOS v5 (minimal install)
CentOS v5 (default install)
Debian v4 (minimal install)
Fedora Core v5 (default install)
Fedora Core v6 (default install)
Fedora Core v7 (minimal install)
Fedora Core v7 (default install)
Fedora Core v8 (minimal install)
Fedora Core v8 (default install)
OpenSuse v10 (default install)
Ubuntu v6.06 (minimal install)
Open-Xchange 0.8.6 (Community Edition) OS template
Monday, August 31, 2009
List premiera Rosji - Władimira Putina do Polaków
Rodacy Stoczniowcy zajmijcie Nasze Poskie Narodowe Stocznie tak dzisiaj i zacznijcie produkowac sami jak to zrobili w Argentynie. Czy to my mamy
Rodacy Stoczniowcy zajmijcie Nasze Poskie Narodowe Stocznie tak dzisiaj i zacznijcie produkowac sami jak to zrobili w Argentynie. Czy to my mamy sie od nich uczyc ale czy oni sie nauczyli od Polski?

Minister Grad NISZCZY Polskie Dobro Narodowe Klamie z pozwolenia Tuska
Tak dzisiaj na falach TVN 24
Stoczniowcy Wy co zmieniliscie kierunek historii i doprowadziliscie do wolnej Polski obudzcie sie!
Did International Money lenders destroyed Argentina 2001 and Latvia 2009?Is Latvia making the Argentinean mistake? Are there any similarities?By Lech Alex Bajan Washington DC
Cold winds are blowing through Latvia. The sun might be shining on the beautiful beaches along the Baltic Sea in this small European Union state, but the temperature of the economy is plunging below zero.)The global financial crisis has hit Latvia hard. Gross domestic product has fallen by 18% percent on an annual basis. As a response to the crisis, public- sector wages have already been lowered by 20% or more. Many schools and hospitals will be shut. The consequences are also political: Latvia's elections to the European parliament on 6 June 2009 showed increased support for the opposition.
The prime minister Valdis Dombrovskis on 9 June secured proposals for even tougher spending cuts amounting to 500 million lats ($9.92 million). This follows demands from international lenders, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Union, for state budget cuts to be reduced by an additional 10%.
Andres Borg, the Swedish finance minister, welcomed the news and - while attending a meeting of European finance ministers in Luxembourg - made clear what he expected of his Latvian colleagues: "We are pleased with a more responsible fiscal policy from Riga...now we need equally strong credibility. (The Latvian government) must do exactly what they say and the effects must be exactly what they say."
NOW this is my post from 2007 You can check?Is Latvia making the Argentinean mistake? Are there any similarities?
It was a few years ago when corporate TV stations showed a terrible situation in Argentina – a country of a stormy past, but in a pretty good shape since the introduction of global economy. Crowds of people protesting in the streets, soldiers shooting at them. Smoke, squibs, fire and unemployment surpassing 22 per cent. In 2001 Argentina was on the bottom of an abyss, from which – according to Western economists – there was no escape.
Globalists, industrialists and bankers were massively leaving the country taking away with them whatever still could be taken. The media were ordered to forget about that country and its sheer existence. In December 2001 Argentina fund herself in an economical hole into which it was pushed by its elites and globalism. The banks stopped paying out the money. Nobody was able to control the economy of the country. President Carlos Menem, previously in power, an industrialist chosen for the post in 1989, had promised Argentineans beautiful women and Ferrari cars. But through the back door he would sell out the country’s assets to foreign hands for ridiculously low prices. He borrowed large sums of money from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The citizens of Argentina, which thanks to the borrowed money was prospering like never before, cheered for their President and declared him a genius of the free market. The idyll ended when they had to start paying back the borrowed money. In 2001 the gross domestic product went down as much as 11 per cent. However, the country did not receive any additional funds or any concrete pieces of advice from the IMF. The history of Argentina is full of unsuccessful uprisings, sudden upheavals, protests and wars. It is also full of poverty of masses and unimaginable richness of a small group of the chosen ones. It is full of corruption, horrible torture and fascist prisons. But by the end of 1990s the whole world was left speechless. What was going on the streets of Argentina was a warning and a prophecy for the enthusiasts of global economy. In private the journalists were wondering how it was possible to ruin a whole country in such a short time. How was it possible that no one noticed that and no one counter-reacted? Such questions were circulating in the Internet and in private conversations. But newspapers and TV bulletins were chasing for sensation and blubbering about fiscal irresponsibility on a large scale.Average Argentineans and the new president, De la Rua, were soon to be blamed for everything. Argentina was alive and kicking, but corporate media did not want to let the public know about it. In 1999, when De la Rua was chosen President and the country had already been in recession for 3 years, conniving CNN would announce that Menem had not been re-elected because he could not enter for election for the third time, according to the constitution. However, he said that he would enter the election in 2003. Menem belonged to Peronists party, the biggest political power in Argentina. He was closely linked with the USA, globalism and free market.
The new President of Argentina had almost no move. Peronists were still in power and they attacked him from the very beginning. De la Rua asked his countrymen in his speeches: ‘Please, understand how important is unity. I want to be the President of all Argentineans.’ When economic crash came, International Monetary Fund was the first to wash their hands. Its experts claimed that Argentina spent too much Money although the country’s budget was much smaller than the budget of the USA during the Great Depression. When the economists ridiculed such an explanation, the lawyers of IMF began their attack. They claimed that Argentina had had such rights to distribute the loans to which the Fund had to adjust and which made normal economical functioning impossible. It means that the Fund wants us to believe that poor Argentina dictated them the conditions. All that show was supervised by the elites of the USA. For the last 55 years, during the whole existence of the International Monetary Fund, the voice of the United States has been decisive. Other rich member countries could easily oppose the USA in voting and win, but by some strange coincidence they never did. When we take a closer look at IMF we will find out that in fact it is only a group of lenders ruled by the American Treasury. We should not be surprised then that the American government (and the obedient American and Western media after them) unanimously stated that Argentina must be submissive to the rules imposed on her by the IMF.
Economical analysis Today we know already why Argentina’s economy collapsed, although the media do not want to say it. I am begging here for a special attention of the readers in Poland. In 1991 Menem based the country’s economy on a ‘higher’ currency which was the American dollar. A stable exchange rate of 1:1 between the dollar and the Argentinean peso was introduced. Menem hoped that the dollar would soon become the circulating currency in Argentina. It was quite a good idea at first, but soon it turned out that the value of the dollar was overrated. Automatically the value of the Argentinean peso was also overvalued. Let us pay attention how the euro is functioning in Poland. At the moment when investors figured out that the value of the peso is overrated they started fearing that it would fall. That is why they began demanding higher and higher interest rates on everything. Also on private and government loans. It caused a huge debt.
The interest rate was raised to 40 per cent. To keep up the parity on the American currency, the Argentinian government had to have adequate amount of American dollars in the banks. The more the crisis developed the more American dollars the government had to buy for a significantly overrated price. More and more people demanded transactions in cash. This process pushed Argentina into a debt of 140 billion of dollars. In December 2001 the Argentinian government announced to the world that they are not able to pay anything.
Argentina became the pariah of nations. To keep up the overrated value of the peso, International Monetary Fund gave Argentina huge loans. Only in one year to the country’s Treasury were sent 40 billion dollars as a package organised by many lending institutions. Only one basic requirement that was to guarantee that these loans would be paid off was to maintain zero budget deficit. Which meant that Argentina had to oscillate on 100 per cent of the budget. It is impossible during a recession to keep 100% of a budget, besides it takes some painful operations like serious cuts in the budget, which in turn cause high level of unemployment eventually leading to street fighting on a big scale. How did that process look like from the point of view of an average, hard-working Argentinian? At the beginning of the 1990s Argentinians were encouraged to buy almost everything.
Companies were privatized and incorporated into conglomerates.People were encouraged to build houses by giving them low-mortgage loans. People were asked to set up their own companies and those who were laid off were given compensation packages. Luxury cars were shown to the middle class and sold for very low down-payments for high-percentage loans and long-term payments. The media shouted out that the situation is so good, that everybody would be able to afford to pay off the loans on cars or houses. ‘You can have everything now – you will pay off later!’. The Argentinians – like Poles today – enjoyed the prosperity not knowing that a trap had been set up for them. After 40 years of poverty and wars they could at last have in their gardens or garages what so far they had seen in American films. With the Western capital came the people whose task was to watch its flow.
They taught Argentinians what the free market and global economy is about. Soon they had such huge influence on Argentina’s administrating structure that the country, practically speaking, lost its independence. In the situation when the American dollar was bought with the peso at the rate of 1:1, everything that was produced in Argentina (as well as services) was too expensive to be exported. The whole country – just like Poland and other countries – was literally choked to death. Import of goods was much cheaper than their production. In that way almost 10% of gross domestic product was destroyed. Mass privatizations at the beginning of the 1990s of almost all national assets for a fraction of its market value had already caused unemployment on a big scale. Mainly electricity, municipal and telecommunication companies were privatized. Globalists know very well how to do it. You start privatizing from the chosen key sectors. After that, other co-operating sectors become incompatible. Then there is no way out but to privatize all other sectors in the structure upwards. When the spiral of privatization went up, the spiral of dismissions from work went down. At the bottom there was a bigger and bigger number of unemployed people ending up with no means of living. On the scale of the country, the spiral movement up was balanced by the movement down. Finally more and more people stopped doing their shopping and the money stopped circulating. So did the taxes. Poor Argentinians did not pay taxes because they had nothing – instead, they started buying rifles. When the money stopped circulating, now privatised companies laid off more and more people to keep up the economy of their firms. Those three inter-related crisises (taxes, unemployment, overrated value of the currency) get the Argentinian government to beg IMF for help or advice. International Monetary Fund, after long negotiations, made their decision. ‘Argentina is too much in debt. We can’t help. Let us leave that country in the state of free falling into an abyss.’
Also, during many military councils the decision was made how to cut off Argentina from the outside world if the expected rebellion of armed Argentinians was to spread across the borders. This decision by IMF get the Argentinians (who foresaw the fall of the value of the peso) to rush to the banks to pay out their savings. The banks were closed, the salaries in many sectors of the country’s economy were held up. In desperation, the President declared that Argentina stopped paying off her debts. The press foretold that in the country there would be hair-raising scenes and after that they lost their interest in the matter.
The Argentinian miracle It seemed that there was no retreat for Argentina. The rats began to leave the sinking ship. President Menem left for Chile. The businessmen and their international advisors were leaving for their countries. Even small investors, whose parents had come to Argentina in search for a better life, frantically tried to get entry visas to their mother countries. Whole factories with full machinery equipment were left behind – it was not profitable to produce there anything any more. The workers were laid off with nothing. Beautiful residences with swimming-pools were left abandoned, as well as whole office blocks lined out with marble. Those who had led to that crisis were moving like locust on other fields which could still be eaten up. ’Time’ magazine was wondering: ‘What can President De la Rua do now? This is a million-dollar question. Whether alone or in a coalition, he immediately needs a plan to ease the crisis. He has to help his countrymen to fill their stomachs and, maybe, to revive economical growth. The problem is that – to ease the results of the crisis concerning poor people – the government has to spend millions of dollars on food and basic needs. And this will cause a further escalation of the financial crisis. Something must happen…’ And it did happen!
The Argentinians trusted their President who broke the negotiations with international financiers. The army, police and ordinary people lined up in support. They claimed that Argentina belonged to Argentinians, not to international financial mafia. The Argentinian government, left alone, made a decision which get the White House and international bankers furious. Against their recommendation, the exchange rate of the peso was freed. Minister of Economy, Roberto Lavagna, stated: ‘Having competitive prices of currency exchange will help our export and enable fulfillment of the country’s needs.’ They also decided to end the free market policy to which the country’s economy was a prisoner.
An economical co-operation with Brazil and China was established. Some capital started to flow to the country. The central bank began to buy the dollar again, but only as much as necessary to keep up the economic growth. When Argentina announced that after 3 years from the moment of separation from degenerated ideas of globalists she was able to pay 30 cents for every dollar of her debt and keep up her unprecedented economical growth, at first nobody believed her. Then the media were strictly forbidden to inform about it. We should not be surprised as it is a palpable proof how quickly an economy of a given country and life of its citizens can improve when they forget about globalist absurdities. In December 2004 the British ‘Guardian’ wrote: Three years ago, in December, Argentina was in crisis. The economy was rolling down uncontrolled into an abyss, banks closed their door to the investors, company presidents changed every week. Today the common opinion among the economists in Buenos Aires are that the country has left the worst behind. Yes, Argentina is still fighting with a complicated process of reconstruction of her debt, but the economy has undergone incredible changes.’
Like Phoenix, the economy has risen from the ashes. After an 11-per-cent fall in 2002, in 2003 the domestic product rose almost 9% and it will rise another 8% this year*. The government carefully announces that GDP will rise 4% in 2005, but most experts in economy believe that in fact the growth will be 5%. The assumptions of ‘free market’ were bad for jobs and employment. In 2002 the unemployment reached its peak with 22%. Now it is 12%. Whether you are faithful believers or not, some commentators say about the rise of Argentina as of a miracle which Rodrigo Rato, the director of IMF, could not cause. The hand of God turned out to be more powerful than the hand of International Monetary Fund. Now nobody is cheating any more. Another thing which is hidden by the media was the fact of absolute unification of the working class with the management class. When the factory owners closed their firms and fled to other countries, their workers and directors occupied nearby cafes and park benches. When they were sitting idly on the streets, they were discussing how to improve their life and situation of their country, doomed to fail. The employees of such abandoned factories as Zanon looked at the gates melancholically. They spent most of their lives in those factories. Finally they made up their minds. They entered the grounds of their empty and devastated factories, started the machines and began production out of the materials which were still in the warehouses. The authorities and the army looked at that almost communist-like behaviour of the people in a friendly manner. Soon department managers, office clerks and economic directors joined the turners, polishers and warehouse men. In the record-breaking time sales and export were initiated.
There were no fixed hours of work. The decisions concerning their factories were taken by the people during short production meetings. It turned out that the production is profitable and needed. What had not been profitable for globalists started to be such for common people without the help from banks and financial cartels. Soon production and sales reached their record levels in some factories. The people shared the profit with one another. They had never earned such sums of money before. So, they started to spend them. Thus building industry and other branches of industry got moving. All that happened so quickly that America did not even have enough time to declare Argentina a communist country.
The Movement of Unemployed Workers (MTD) was established. Soon this organisation had the power to influence politics. And that was yet another mystery of the Argentinian miracle. The rats come back The situation of Argentina began to improve. Globalists and factory owners began to come back and demand a return of their factories taken over by the people. Those who had left the country on the verge of a civil war 3 years before, now have some claims quoting international laws. Does that remind the Poles of something? MTD, which was created almost literally on the streets, is strong. The organization is threatening with mass demonstrations. The ceramics factory, Zanon, the first one to be taken over by its workers and revived to the state of a profitable works, has become a symbol of the new and better, like Gdansk Shipyard used to be for Poles. MTD is considered by CIA and other similar organizations as a group which managed to create the most modern strategies and solutions how to unite and defend people from capitalism. The returning rats from international financial circles are fighting back. Because Argentina constitutes a serious threat to the whole global economy, we should assume that if the USA wasn’t involved in Iraq now, the American soldiers would be defending their oil under the Argentinian grass in the name of democracy, or would be defending the freedom of their country there. Kirchner, new President of Argentina, demands the extradition of the ex-president Carlos Menem, who is in Chile. Menem is wanted by the Argentinian authorities for corruption and bringing the country to ruin. He planned to enter for the presidential election in 2007 and used to promise the factory owners to return their property. Of course, that is why he enjoys the support from international financiers and can afford to laugh at the orders and decisions of Argentinian courts of law. In January 2005 international bankers agreed to the proposal from the Argentinian government to be paid 25 cents for every dollar of the debt. An unseen thing happened – Argentina declared a war to IMF and several other globalist organizations and won. Argentina, protected by her own army, not only blackmailed the globalists, but also refused any negotiations with 700,000 holders of the state bonds. Argentina has an open way to be accepted back to the community of international societies from which she had been thrown away before. And she did it on her own conditions, as a full member, making decisions on her own. Many bankers and international investors accuse Argentina of totalitarism and cheating investors and lenders. It caused quarrels among big financiers, Italian and American among others, who claim that if it was not for 9/11, they would be talking to Argentinians in a different manner. Three months later IMF again began demanding a full payment of the debts. But Argentina was already strong enough being in economic co-operation with Brazil and China to show the bankers from Wall Street ‘the middle finger of her right hand’. Argentina started to prove to the world that about half of the creditors had already made a considerable profit on the Argentinian debts and that it was not fair that they should demand any more.This opinion was exposed by Chinese and Indian media. By the way, Argentina showed in black and white how some people tried to bring the country to bankruptcy and what it meant in practice. The British ‘Guardian’ writes: ‘Three things worked for the benefit of Argentina. First, Kirchner’s card was strong thanks to the strong economy. Secondly, the truth about IMF was being revealed, that is why they wanted a quick settlement. Thirdly, Wall Street left Argentina just before the crisis and the negotiations were led by European banks. So the American Treasury was not pressed to play hard with Argentina. Also, they did not want Kirchner to make friends with a strong populist, President of Brazil, Lula. Now many indebted countries may follow Argentina’s footsteps – and show the globalists their behind. Including Poland. And that is what the financial circles fear most. A precedence was created. A relatively non-significant country, held up against the wall, defied the wide-spread slogans of democracy, law and free market. And she won – at least so far. There has emerged a big chance for other countries. Now, when the American army is involved in Iraq, they can get rid of the yoke. You only need to want it and go for it. Just like the citizens of Argentina did, regardless of their social function, possessions and education.
Alex Lech Bajan RAQport Washington DC mailto:office@raqport.com tel USA 001-703-528-0114
Wyniki 1 - 21 spośród 21 wyników dla zapytania stocznia. (Znaleziono w 0.02 sek.)
Sytuacja w polskich stoczniach (2009-08-21)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Karol Guzikiewicz - wiceprzewodniczący Solidarności Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17817
Co dalej z polskimi stoczniami? (2009-08-18)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Lech Wydrzyński - przewodniczący Szczecińskiego Stowarzyszenia Obrony Stoczni i Przemysłu Okrętowego w Polsce
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17790
Co dzieje się w polskich stoczniach? (2009-08-08)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: pos. Marek Gróbarczyk, poseł do Parlamentu Europejskiego
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17702
Wizyta Neelie Kroes w stoczniach w Szczecinie, Gdyni i Gdańsku (2009-07-11)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski, były prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17381
Formalne zatrzymanie produkcji statków w stoczniach w Szczecinie i w Gdyni (2009-05-29)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Paweł Brzezicki
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=14947
Debata stoczniowa (2009-05-14)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Marek Gróbarczyk - były minister gospodarki morskiej, Andrzej Jaworski - prezes fundacji Stocznia Gdańska
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=14877
Rząd zataił dokumenty przed Polakami (2009-04-21)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: były prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej Andrzej Jaworski, prezes stowarzyszenia Stocznia Gdańska
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=14550
Zwolnienia w stoczniach (2009-01-26)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Kpt. ż. w. Zbigniew Sulatycki
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=10672
Co dalej ze stoczniami? (2008-11-07)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=9746
Co dalej z polskimi stoczniami? (2008-10-03)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=9415
Walka o przetrwanie polskiego przemysłu stoczniowego (2008-09-19)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - prezes fundacji Stocznia Gdańska, Roman Gałęzewski - przewodniczący Solidarności Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=9248
Jaka przyszłość przemysłu stoczniowego w Polsce? (2008-08-22)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Ryszard Kwidzyński oraz Grzegorz Huszcz - b. wiceprezesi Stoczni Szczecińskiej, Lech Wydrzyński i Jerzy Corda - akcjonariusze Stoczni Szczecińskiej, Andrzej Jaworski - b. prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej, Prezes Fundacji Stocznia Gdańska, Brunon Baranowski - czło
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8926
Sytuacja w stoczniach (2008-07-09)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: prez. Andrzej Jaworski
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8524
Enigmatyczny program zatopienia Stoczni Gdańskiej i sprzedaży Polskiej Żeglugi Morskiej cz.II (2008-06-26)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - b.prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej, prezes Fundacji Stocznia Gdańska; Brunon Baranowski - przew. Komisji Międzyzakładowej NSZZ Solidarność; Mieczysław Folta - kpt. Żeglugi Wielkiej, przew. Rady Pracowniczej PŻM; Paweł Kowalski - przew. Komisji
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8423
Enigmatyczny program zatopienia Stoczni Gdańskiej i sprzedaży Polskiej Żeglugi Morskiej (2008-06-26)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - b.prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej, prezes Fundacji Stocznia Gdańska; Brunon Baranowski - przew. Komisji Międzyzakładowej NSZZ Solidarność; Mieczysław Folta - kpt. Żeglugi Wielkiej, przew. Rady Pracowniczej PŻM; Paweł Kowalski - przew. Komisji
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8422
Donald Tusk przekazuje nieprawdziwe informacje o polskich stoczniach (2007-10-09)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - Prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=6047
Problem w polskich stoczniach (2007-01-25)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Paweł Brzezicki - Prezes Agencji Rozwoju Przemysłu
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=4129
O co walczy Stocznia Gdynia? (2006-12-02)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - Prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=3582
Stocznia Gdańska wytoczyła proces "Gazecie Wyborczej" (2006-10-19)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - Prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=3170
Stocznia Gdańska została oddzielona od Gdyńskiej (2006-08-22)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Paweł Brzezicki - prezes Agencji Rozwoju Przemysłu
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=2699
Co dalej z kolebką Solidarności? Obecna sytuacja w Stoczniach: Gdańskiej i Gdyńskiej. (2006-06-21)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=2306

Minister Grad NISZCZY Polskie Dobro Narodowe Klamie z pozwolenia Tuska
Tak dzisiaj na falach TVN 24
Stoczniowcy Wy co zmieniliscie kierunek historii i doprowadziliscie do wolnej Polski obudzcie sie!
Did International Money lenders destroyed Argentina 2001 and Latvia 2009?Is Latvia making the Argentinean mistake? Are there any similarities?By Lech Alex Bajan Washington DC
Cold winds are blowing through Latvia. The sun might be shining on the beautiful beaches along the Baltic Sea in this small European Union state, but the temperature of the economy is plunging below zero.)The global financial crisis has hit Latvia hard. Gross domestic product has fallen by 18% percent on an annual basis. As a response to the crisis, public- sector wages have already been lowered by 20% or more. Many schools and hospitals will be shut. The consequences are also political: Latvia's elections to the European parliament on 6 June 2009 showed increased support for the opposition.
The prime minister Valdis Dombrovskis on 9 June secured proposals for even tougher spending cuts amounting to 500 million lats ($9.92 million). This follows demands from international lenders, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Union, for state budget cuts to be reduced by an additional 10%.
Andres Borg, the Swedish finance minister, welcomed the news and - while attending a meeting of European finance ministers in Luxembourg - made clear what he expected of his Latvian colleagues: "We are pleased with a more responsible fiscal policy from Riga...now we need equally strong credibility. (The Latvian government) must do exactly what they say and the effects must be exactly what they say."
NOW this is my post from 2007 You can check?Is Latvia making the Argentinean mistake? Are there any similarities?
It was a few years ago when corporate TV stations showed a terrible situation in Argentina – a country of a stormy past, but in a pretty good shape since the introduction of global economy. Crowds of people protesting in the streets, soldiers shooting at them. Smoke, squibs, fire and unemployment surpassing 22 per cent. In 2001 Argentina was on the bottom of an abyss, from which – according to Western economists – there was no escape.
Globalists, industrialists and bankers were massively leaving the country taking away with them whatever still could be taken. The media were ordered to forget about that country and its sheer existence. In December 2001 Argentina fund herself in an economical hole into which it was pushed by its elites and globalism. The banks stopped paying out the money. Nobody was able to control the economy of the country. President Carlos Menem, previously in power, an industrialist chosen for the post in 1989, had promised Argentineans beautiful women and Ferrari cars. But through the back door he would sell out the country’s assets to foreign hands for ridiculously low prices. He borrowed large sums of money from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The citizens of Argentina, which thanks to the borrowed money was prospering like never before, cheered for their President and declared him a genius of the free market. The idyll ended when they had to start paying back the borrowed money. In 2001 the gross domestic product went down as much as 11 per cent. However, the country did not receive any additional funds or any concrete pieces of advice from the IMF. The history of Argentina is full of unsuccessful uprisings, sudden upheavals, protests and wars. It is also full of poverty of masses and unimaginable richness of a small group of the chosen ones. It is full of corruption, horrible torture and fascist prisons. But by the end of 1990s the whole world was left speechless. What was going on the streets of Argentina was a warning and a prophecy for the enthusiasts of global economy. In private the journalists were wondering how it was possible to ruin a whole country in such a short time. How was it possible that no one noticed that and no one counter-reacted? Such questions were circulating in the Internet and in private conversations. But newspapers and TV bulletins were chasing for sensation and blubbering about fiscal irresponsibility on a large scale.Average Argentineans and the new president, De la Rua, were soon to be blamed for everything. Argentina was alive and kicking, but corporate media did not want to let the public know about it. In 1999, when De la Rua was chosen President and the country had already been in recession for 3 years, conniving CNN would announce that Menem had not been re-elected because he could not enter for election for the third time, according to the constitution. However, he said that he would enter the election in 2003. Menem belonged to Peronists party, the biggest political power in Argentina. He was closely linked with the USA, globalism and free market.
The new President of Argentina had almost no move. Peronists were still in power and they attacked him from the very beginning. De la Rua asked his countrymen in his speeches: ‘Please, understand how important is unity. I want to be the President of all Argentineans.’ When economic crash came, International Monetary Fund was the first to wash their hands. Its experts claimed that Argentina spent too much Money although the country’s budget was much smaller than the budget of the USA during the Great Depression. When the economists ridiculed such an explanation, the lawyers of IMF began their attack. They claimed that Argentina had had such rights to distribute the loans to which the Fund had to adjust and which made normal economical functioning impossible. It means that the Fund wants us to believe that poor Argentina dictated them the conditions. All that show was supervised by the elites of the USA. For the last 55 years, during the whole existence of the International Monetary Fund, the voice of the United States has been decisive. Other rich member countries could easily oppose the USA in voting and win, but by some strange coincidence they never did. When we take a closer look at IMF we will find out that in fact it is only a group of lenders ruled by the American Treasury. We should not be surprised then that the American government (and the obedient American and Western media after them) unanimously stated that Argentina must be submissive to the rules imposed on her by the IMF.
Economical analysis Today we know already why Argentina’s economy collapsed, although the media do not want to say it. I am begging here for a special attention of the readers in Poland. In 1991 Menem based the country’s economy on a ‘higher’ currency which was the American dollar. A stable exchange rate of 1:1 between the dollar and the Argentinean peso was introduced. Menem hoped that the dollar would soon become the circulating currency in Argentina. It was quite a good idea at first, but soon it turned out that the value of the dollar was overrated. Automatically the value of the Argentinean peso was also overvalued. Let us pay attention how the euro is functioning in Poland. At the moment when investors figured out that the value of the peso is overrated they started fearing that it would fall. That is why they began demanding higher and higher interest rates on everything. Also on private and government loans. It caused a huge debt.
The interest rate was raised to 40 per cent. To keep up the parity on the American currency, the Argentinian government had to have adequate amount of American dollars in the banks. The more the crisis developed the more American dollars the government had to buy for a significantly overrated price. More and more people demanded transactions in cash. This process pushed Argentina into a debt of 140 billion of dollars. In December 2001 the Argentinian government announced to the world that they are not able to pay anything.
Argentina became the pariah of nations. To keep up the overrated value of the peso, International Monetary Fund gave Argentina huge loans. Only in one year to the country’s Treasury were sent 40 billion dollars as a package organised by many lending institutions. Only one basic requirement that was to guarantee that these loans would be paid off was to maintain zero budget deficit. Which meant that Argentina had to oscillate on 100 per cent of the budget. It is impossible during a recession to keep 100% of a budget, besides it takes some painful operations like serious cuts in the budget, which in turn cause high level of unemployment eventually leading to street fighting on a big scale. How did that process look like from the point of view of an average, hard-working Argentinian? At the beginning of the 1990s Argentinians were encouraged to buy almost everything.
Companies were privatized and incorporated into conglomerates.People were encouraged to build houses by giving them low-mortgage loans. People were asked to set up their own companies and those who were laid off were given compensation packages. Luxury cars were shown to the middle class and sold for very low down-payments for high-percentage loans and long-term payments. The media shouted out that the situation is so good, that everybody would be able to afford to pay off the loans on cars or houses. ‘You can have everything now – you will pay off later!’. The Argentinians – like Poles today – enjoyed the prosperity not knowing that a trap had been set up for them. After 40 years of poverty and wars they could at last have in their gardens or garages what so far they had seen in American films. With the Western capital came the people whose task was to watch its flow.
They taught Argentinians what the free market and global economy is about. Soon they had such huge influence on Argentina’s administrating structure that the country, practically speaking, lost its independence. In the situation when the American dollar was bought with the peso at the rate of 1:1, everything that was produced in Argentina (as well as services) was too expensive to be exported. The whole country – just like Poland and other countries – was literally choked to death. Import of goods was much cheaper than their production. In that way almost 10% of gross domestic product was destroyed. Mass privatizations at the beginning of the 1990s of almost all national assets for a fraction of its market value had already caused unemployment on a big scale. Mainly electricity, municipal and telecommunication companies were privatized. Globalists know very well how to do it. You start privatizing from the chosen key sectors. After that, other co-operating sectors become incompatible. Then there is no way out but to privatize all other sectors in the structure upwards. When the spiral of privatization went up, the spiral of dismissions from work went down. At the bottom there was a bigger and bigger number of unemployed people ending up with no means of living. On the scale of the country, the spiral movement up was balanced by the movement down. Finally more and more people stopped doing their shopping and the money stopped circulating. So did the taxes. Poor Argentinians did not pay taxes because they had nothing – instead, they started buying rifles. When the money stopped circulating, now privatised companies laid off more and more people to keep up the economy of their firms. Those three inter-related crisises (taxes, unemployment, overrated value of the currency) get the Argentinian government to beg IMF for help or advice. International Monetary Fund, after long negotiations, made their decision. ‘Argentina is too much in debt. We can’t help. Let us leave that country in the state of free falling into an abyss.’
Also, during many military councils the decision was made how to cut off Argentina from the outside world if the expected rebellion of armed Argentinians was to spread across the borders. This decision by IMF get the Argentinians (who foresaw the fall of the value of the peso) to rush to the banks to pay out their savings. The banks were closed, the salaries in many sectors of the country’s economy were held up. In desperation, the President declared that Argentina stopped paying off her debts. The press foretold that in the country there would be hair-raising scenes and after that they lost their interest in the matter.
The Argentinian miracle It seemed that there was no retreat for Argentina. The rats began to leave the sinking ship. President Menem left for Chile. The businessmen and their international advisors were leaving for their countries. Even small investors, whose parents had come to Argentina in search for a better life, frantically tried to get entry visas to their mother countries. Whole factories with full machinery equipment were left behind – it was not profitable to produce there anything any more. The workers were laid off with nothing. Beautiful residences with swimming-pools were left abandoned, as well as whole office blocks lined out with marble. Those who had led to that crisis were moving like locust on other fields which could still be eaten up. ’Time’ magazine was wondering: ‘What can President De la Rua do now? This is a million-dollar question. Whether alone or in a coalition, he immediately needs a plan to ease the crisis. He has to help his countrymen to fill their stomachs and, maybe, to revive economical growth. The problem is that – to ease the results of the crisis concerning poor people – the government has to spend millions of dollars on food and basic needs. And this will cause a further escalation of the financial crisis. Something must happen…’ And it did happen!
The Argentinians trusted their President who broke the negotiations with international financiers. The army, police and ordinary people lined up in support. They claimed that Argentina belonged to Argentinians, not to international financial mafia. The Argentinian government, left alone, made a decision which get the White House and international bankers furious. Against their recommendation, the exchange rate of the peso was freed. Minister of Economy, Roberto Lavagna, stated: ‘Having competitive prices of currency exchange will help our export and enable fulfillment of the country’s needs.’ They also decided to end the free market policy to which the country’s economy was a prisoner.
An economical co-operation with Brazil and China was established. Some capital started to flow to the country. The central bank began to buy the dollar again, but only as much as necessary to keep up the economic growth. When Argentina announced that after 3 years from the moment of separation from degenerated ideas of globalists she was able to pay 30 cents for every dollar of her debt and keep up her unprecedented economical growth, at first nobody believed her. Then the media were strictly forbidden to inform about it. We should not be surprised as it is a palpable proof how quickly an economy of a given country and life of its citizens can improve when they forget about globalist absurdities. In December 2004 the British ‘Guardian’ wrote: Three years ago, in December, Argentina was in crisis. The economy was rolling down uncontrolled into an abyss, banks closed their door to the investors, company presidents changed every week. Today the common opinion among the economists in Buenos Aires are that the country has left the worst behind. Yes, Argentina is still fighting with a complicated process of reconstruction of her debt, but the economy has undergone incredible changes.’
Like Phoenix, the economy has risen from the ashes. After an 11-per-cent fall in 2002, in 2003 the domestic product rose almost 9% and it will rise another 8% this year*. The government carefully announces that GDP will rise 4% in 2005, but most experts in economy believe that in fact the growth will be 5%. The assumptions of ‘free market’ were bad for jobs and employment. In 2002 the unemployment reached its peak with 22%. Now it is 12%. Whether you are faithful believers or not, some commentators say about the rise of Argentina as of a miracle which Rodrigo Rato, the director of IMF, could not cause. The hand of God turned out to be more powerful than the hand of International Monetary Fund. Now nobody is cheating any more. Another thing which is hidden by the media was the fact of absolute unification of the working class with the management class. When the factory owners closed their firms and fled to other countries, their workers and directors occupied nearby cafes and park benches. When they were sitting idly on the streets, they were discussing how to improve their life and situation of their country, doomed to fail. The employees of such abandoned factories as Zanon looked at the gates melancholically. They spent most of their lives in those factories. Finally they made up their minds. They entered the grounds of their empty and devastated factories, started the machines and began production out of the materials which were still in the warehouses. The authorities and the army looked at that almost communist-like behaviour of the people in a friendly manner. Soon department managers, office clerks and economic directors joined the turners, polishers and warehouse men. In the record-breaking time sales and export were initiated.
There were no fixed hours of work. The decisions concerning their factories were taken by the people during short production meetings. It turned out that the production is profitable and needed. What had not been profitable for globalists started to be such for common people without the help from banks and financial cartels. Soon production and sales reached their record levels in some factories. The people shared the profit with one another. They had never earned such sums of money before. So, they started to spend them. Thus building industry and other branches of industry got moving. All that happened so quickly that America did not even have enough time to declare Argentina a communist country.
The Movement of Unemployed Workers (MTD) was established. Soon this organisation had the power to influence politics. And that was yet another mystery of the Argentinian miracle. The rats come back The situation of Argentina began to improve. Globalists and factory owners began to come back and demand a return of their factories taken over by the people. Those who had left the country on the verge of a civil war 3 years before, now have some claims quoting international laws. Does that remind the Poles of something? MTD, which was created almost literally on the streets, is strong. The organization is threatening with mass demonstrations. The ceramics factory, Zanon, the first one to be taken over by its workers and revived to the state of a profitable works, has become a symbol of the new and better, like Gdansk Shipyard used to be for Poles. MTD is considered by CIA and other similar organizations as a group which managed to create the most modern strategies and solutions how to unite and defend people from capitalism. The returning rats from international financial circles are fighting back. Because Argentina constitutes a serious threat to the whole global economy, we should assume that if the USA wasn’t involved in Iraq now, the American soldiers would be defending their oil under the Argentinian grass in the name of democracy, or would be defending the freedom of their country there. Kirchner, new President of Argentina, demands the extradition of the ex-president Carlos Menem, who is in Chile. Menem is wanted by the Argentinian authorities for corruption and bringing the country to ruin. He planned to enter for the presidential election in 2007 and used to promise the factory owners to return their property. Of course, that is why he enjoys the support from international financiers and can afford to laugh at the orders and decisions of Argentinian courts of law. In January 2005 international bankers agreed to the proposal from the Argentinian government to be paid 25 cents for every dollar of the debt. An unseen thing happened – Argentina declared a war to IMF and several other globalist organizations and won. Argentina, protected by her own army, not only blackmailed the globalists, but also refused any negotiations with 700,000 holders of the state bonds. Argentina has an open way to be accepted back to the community of international societies from which she had been thrown away before. And she did it on her own conditions, as a full member, making decisions on her own. Many bankers and international investors accuse Argentina of totalitarism and cheating investors and lenders. It caused quarrels among big financiers, Italian and American among others, who claim that if it was not for 9/11, they would be talking to Argentinians in a different manner. Three months later IMF again began demanding a full payment of the debts. But Argentina was already strong enough being in economic co-operation with Brazil and China to show the bankers from Wall Street ‘the middle finger of her right hand’. Argentina started to prove to the world that about half of the creditors had already made a considerable profit on the Argentinian debts and that it was not fair that they should demand any more.This opinion was exposed by Chinese and Indian media. By the way, Argentina showed in black and white how some people tried to bring the country to bankruptcy and what it meant in practice. The British ‘Guardian’ writes: ‘Three things worked for the benefit of Argentina. First, Kirchner’s card was strong thanks to the strong economy. Secondly, the truth about IMF was being revealed, that is why they wanted a quick settlement. Thirdly, Wall Street left Argentina just before the crisis and the negotiations were led by European banks. So the American Treasury was not pressed to play hard with Argentina. Also, they did not want Kirchner to make friends with a strong populist, President of Brazil, Lula. Now many indebted countries may follow Argentina’s footsteps – and show the globalists their behind. Including Poland. And that is what the financial circles fear most. A precedence was created. A relatively non-significant country, held up against the wall, defied the wide-spread slogans of democracy, law and free market. And she won – at least so far. There has emerged a big chance for other countries. Now, when the American army is involved in Iraq, they can get rid of the yoke. You only need to want it and go for it. Just like the citizens of Argentina did, regardless of their social function, possessions and education.
Alex Lech Bajan RAQport Washington DC mailto:office@raqport.com tel USA 001-703-528-0114
Wyniki 1 - 21 spośród 21 wyników dla zapytania stocznia. (Znaleziono w 0.02 sek.)
Sytuacja w polskich stoczniach (2009-08-21)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Karol Guzikiewicz - wiceprzewodniczący Solidarności Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17817
Co dalej z polskimi stoczniami? (2009-08-18)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Lech Wydrzyński - przewodniczący Szczecińskiego Stowarzyszenia Obrony Stoczni i Przemysłu Okrętowego w Polsce
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17790
Co dzieje się w polskich stoczniach? (2009-08-08)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: pos. Marek Gróbarczyk, poseł do Parlamentu Europejskiego
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17702
Wizyta Neelie Kroes w stoczniach w Szczecinie, Gdyni i Gdańsku (2009-07-11)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski, były prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=17381
Formalne zatrzymanie produkcji statków w stoczniach w Szczecinie i w Gdyni (2009-05-29)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Paweł Brzezicki
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=14947
Debata stoczniowa (2009-05-14)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Marek Gróbarczyk - były minister gospodarki morskiej, Andrzej Jaworski - prezes fundacji Stocznia Gdańska
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=14877
Rząd zataił dokumenty przed Polakami (2009-04-21)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: były prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej Andrzej Jaworski, prezes stowarzyszenia Stocznia Gdańska
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=14550
Zwolnienia w stoczniach (2009-01-26)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Kpt. ż. w. Zbigniew Sulatycki
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=10672
Co dalej ze stoczniami? (2008-11-07)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=9746
Co dalej z polskimi stoczniami? (2008-10-03)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=9415
Walka o przetrwanie polskiego przemysłu stoczniowego (2008-09-19)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - prezes fundacji Stocznia Gdańska, Roman Gałęzewski - przewodniczący Solidarności Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=9248
Jaka przyszłość przemysłu stoczniowego w Polsce? (2008-08-22)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Ryszard Kwidzyński oraz Grzegorz Huszcz - b. wiceprezesi Stoczni Szczecińskiej, Lech Wydrzyński i Jerzy Corda - akcjonariusze Stoczni Szczecińskiej, Andrzej Jaworski - b. prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej, Prezes Fundacji Stocznia Gdańska, Brunon Baranowski - czło
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8926
Sytuacja w stoczniach (2008-07-09)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: prez. Andrzej Jaworski
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8524
Enigmatyczny program zatopienia Stoczni Gdańskiej i sprzedaży Polskiej Żeglugi Morskiej cz.II (2008-06-26)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - b.prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej, prezes Fundacji Stocznia Gdańska; Brunon Baranowski - przew. Komisji Międzyzakładowej NSZZ Solidarność; Mieczysław Folta - kpt. Żeglugi Wielkiej, przew. Rady Pracowniczej PŻM; Paweł Kowalski - przew. Komisji
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8423
Enigmatyczny program zatopienia Stoczni Gdańskiej i sprzedaży Polskiej Żeglugi Morskiej (2008-06-26)
Rodzaj audycji: [Rozmowy niedokończone]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - b.prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej, prezes Fundacji Stocznia Gdańska; Brunon Baranowski - przew. Komisji Międzyzakładowej NSZZ Solidarność; Mieczysław Folta - kpt. Żeglugi Wielkiej, przew. Rady Pracowniczej PŻM; Paweł Kowalski - przew. Komisji
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=8422
Donald Tusk przekazuje nieprawdziwe informacje o polskich stoczniach (2007-10-09)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - Prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=6047
Problem w polskich stoczniach (2007-01-25)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Paweł Brzezicki - Prezes Agencji Rozwoju Przemysłu
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=4129
O co walczy Stocznia Gdynia? (2006-12-02)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - Prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=3582
Stocznia Gdańska wytoczyła proces "Gazecie Wyborczej" (2006-10-19)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - Prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=3170
Stocznia Gdańska została oddzielona od Gdyńskiej (2006-08-22)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Paweł Brzezicki - prezes Agencji Rozwoju Przemysłu
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=2699
Co dalej z kolebką Solidarności? Obecna sytuacja w Stoczniach: Gdańskiej i Gdyńskiej. (2006-06-21)
Rodzaj audycji: [Aktualności dnia]
Autor: Andrzej Jaworski - prezes Stoczni Gdańskiej
Adres: http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=2306
Thursday, August 27, 2009
On September 1, 1939, at 04:45 local time 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II at Westerplatte Poland with no American Delegation. Where i
On September 1, 1939, at 04:45 local time 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II at Westerplatte Poland with no American Delegation. Where is president Obama, Vice President Biden or Secretary of state Hillary Clinton?
Polish American Community and people of Poland one of the US strongest allied are outrage that US is not sending high ranking delegation to this event.
70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II at Westerplatte will be attended by German chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin and other 69 Heads of States and Governments will Participante.Among those expected to be present at the Westerplatte monument on 1 September are also the prime ministers of Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, the Baltic states, Finland, as well as European Parliament president Jerzy Buzek. France and the UK, which were Poland's allies in 1939, will be represented by foreign ministers Bernard Kouchner and David Miliband.
But not from United States of America
To the entire world Westerplatte ( the Polish Thermopile ) in Poland is like Pearl Harbor to American people.
i zdrada / ...and betrayal 10
Westerplatte (1967) part03 [English Subtitles] Polish war movie
Clips from CBC mini documentary about Poland's contribution to the war effort. Polish pilots of the RAF. Betrayal of Poland by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin.
Over the course of the violent engagement some 2,600 German soldiers fought against the 205-strong garrison of stalwart Poles. The exact number of German casualties has never been disclosed, but is assumed to be quite high in comparison to the Polish figures - of the 205 Polish soldiers defending the outpost, only 14 perished (including the Polish radio operator, later executed for refusing to divulge radio codes to the German side) while 53 were wounded.
On September 1, 1939, at 04:45 local time, as Germany began its invasion of Poland, Schleswig-Holstein started to shell the Polish garrison. This was followed by a repelled attack by German naval infantry. Another two assaults that day were repelled as well. Over the coming days, the Germans repeatedly bombarded Westerplatte with naval and heavy field artillery along with dive-bombing raids by Junkers Ju 87 Stukas. Repeated attacks of 3500 German soldiers were repelled by the 180 Polish soldiers for seven days. Major Henryk Sucharski had been informed that no help from the Polish Army would come but still he decided to defend to relieve attacks on Polish coast - most of the German forces were engaged in the attacks on Westerplatte. On September 7th Major Henryk Sucharski decided to surrender due to lack of ammunition and supplies. As a sign of honor for the soldiers of Westerplatte, German commander, Gen. Eberhardt, allowed Mjr. Sucharski to keep his officer's sword while being taken prisoner.
Westerplatte Defenders Repulse Attacks From Sea, Air and Land; 70 to 200 Polish 'Suicide Troops' Shatter Two German Attempts to Storm Fortress After Plane and Ship Bombardments.
A band of Polish soldiers who for six days fought a "battle of the Alamo" under constant German siege today surrendered Westerplatte Fortress in Danzig Harbor, where the first shot of the European war was fired, according to announcement in Berlin
Westerplatte - il cimitero dei soldati caduti durante i combattimenti nel settembre 1939. Al centro la lapide del comandante, il maggiore Henryk Sucharski. L'avamposto militare di Westerplatte, secondo i piani strategici di difesa, doveva resistere al nemico soltanto 12 ore in attesa dell'arrivo dei soccorsi. Aveva invece resistito sette giorni agli attacchi furiosi della nave corazzata "Schlezwig-Holstein", della fanteria e delle forze aeree tedesche.
Sep 1, 1939 - Am 1. September 1939, einen Tag nachdem der Senat die Verdienstmedaille Danziger Kreuz beschlossen hatte, beschoss die Wehrmacht die Westerplatte, und im Gefecht um das Polnische Postamt in Danzig wurde dieses Gebäude erstürmt. Zudem trafen Truppen der.
Sep 1, 1939 - Pouco faltava para as cinco da manhã de 1 de Setembro de 1939, quando o couraçado alemão Schleswig-Holstein, ancorado na foz do Vístula no interior da Cidade Livre de Gdańsk começou a bombardear a guarnição militar polaca em Westerplatte.
Sep 2, 1939 - "The commander in chief greets the gallant garrison at Westerplatte and expects every man to stick to his sanguinary post." BY ANDREAS BACKER. I ... The call for sacrifice was directed at the "suicide battalion" which mans the Polish munitions dump of Westerplatte off Danzig harbor.
Sep 4, 1939 - After three days of bombardment from sea and air, a little Polish garrison still held the Westerplatte munitions base in Danzig Harbor tonight. ... Thirty airplanes dropped between fifty and sixty bombs on the Westerplatte yesterday, but the Poles still retaliated with machine-gun fire.
Sep 7, 1939 - When this writer left the Nazi-held city of Danzig yesterday morning a small force of Polish soldiers--between 70 and 200 of them--still resisted valiantly in Westerplatte fortress after four days of a fierce siege. Machine-gun fire from the Polish garrison shattered completely two ...
Sep 8, 1939 - A band of Polish soldiers who for six days fought a "battle of the Alamo" under constant German siege today surrendered Westerplatte Fortress in ... The Schleswig-Holstein steamed into position early is the day; trained her gone on the Westerplatte and blasted away: All that , day the ...
Sep 10, 1939 - They were aimed at the Westerplatte, a small Polish fortress, on a Danzig peninsula.. For nearly a week after Danzig had been proclaimed by Adolf Hitler a part of the Reich and German troops had occupied the city, the Polish garrison of the Westerplatte held out. ...
Today the ruins of the barracks and two blockhouses - the only structures on the island - still remain. One of the blockhouses has been converted into a museum commemorating the battle and those who fought there, with two shells from the Schleswig-Holstein ironically propping the entrance. A placid 25m tall stone monument now marks the site of this infamous exchange that preceded the levelling of Gdansk's Old Town and sparked a worldwide conflict that would result in immeasurable suffering (particularly in Poland). Though it is outside the city, Westerplatte is a worthwhile venture for anyone visiting Gdansk; like so many sights in Poland, it is haunted by it's troubling history in the face of a beautiful natural environment.
Gdansk's picturesque Westerplatte peninsula has the unhappy distinction of being the site of the official start of the Second World War. A small forested island separated from Gdansk by the harbour channel, Westerplatte was established as a Polish military outpost during the interwar period, equipped with one 75mm field gun, two 37mm antitank guns (slightly mystifying for a coastal defense), four mortars and several medium machine guns, but lacking any true fortifications. By the autumn of 1939, the Polish garrison occupying Westerplatte comprised of 182 soldiers expected to withstand a potential attack for twelve hours.
In late August, 1939, under the suspect pretense of an amiable courtesy visit, the German battleship Schleswig-Holstein dropped anchor in the channel off Westerplatte and on September 1, at exactly 04:45 local time, began it's barrage of the Polish outpost with its superior 280 and 150mm guns. Thus began Germany's invasion of Poland, igniting the powderkeg that would explode into World War II.
Expecting an easy victory, the German offensive was sternly repelled by Polish small arms and machine gun fire, and suffered unexpected losses during two more assaults upon Westerplatte the same day. The only Polish 75mm gun was destroyed after discharging 28 shells into the German position across the channel. Despite a German naval infantry invasion, sustained bombardment by heavy artillery and diving airraids from German warplanes, the Polish garrison repulsed the Germans for seven days, before the depleted unit, suffering from exhaustion, severe injury and a shortage of food, water, ammunition and medical supplies, was forced to surrender on September 7th.
A Song of the Soldiers of Westerplatte
Boleslaw Prus
When their days had been filled
and it was time to die in the summer,
They went straight to heaven in a coach-and-four,
the soldiers of Westerplatte.
(Summer was beautiful that year.)
They sang: "Ah, ‘tis nothing
that our wounds were so painful,
for now it is sweet to walk
the heavenly fields."
(On earth that year there was plenty of heather for bouquets.)
In Gdansk we stood like a wall
in defiance of the German offensive,
now we soar among the clouds,
we soldiers of Westerplatte.
Those with keen sense of sight
and sound are said to have heard
in the clouds the measured step
of the Maratime Batallion.
This was the song they heard: "We'll
take advantage of the sunshine
and bask in the warm days
in the heather fields of paradise.
But when the cold wind blows
and sorrow courses the earth,
We'll float down to the center of Warsaw,
The soldiers of Westerplatte."
-translated by Walter Whipple
1st September 1939
At 04.30 Stuka dive-bombers prematurely bombed the bridge at Tczew in the Pomeranian Corridor. SS troops dressed in Polish uniforms attacked the radio station at Gleiwitz and broadcast inflammatory statements urging Polish minorities to take up arms against Hitler. For a touch of realism, several bodies of concentration inmates dressed in Polish uniforms, were left behind as 'evidence' for journalists (Zaloga and Madej, 1991) to report on.
The Free City of Danzig was heavily shelled and bombed, inflicting heavy casualties upon the civilian population and military coastal defences or navy flotillas. In Danzig, the defenders, particularly civilian volunteers were shot. The Army Pomorze faced the 4th Army whose tactic was to isolate them in the north from the rest of the Polish Forces and then link up with the Third Army and attack Warsaw.
Daylong fighting produced at times, scenes of sheer heroism. The Pomorska Cavalry Brigade had been in contacts with the German 20th Motorized Infantry Division. Colonel Masterlarz had half the unit mount up and attempted a surprise attack from the rear. Catching an infantry battalion by surprise in a woodland clearing, the sabre attack wiped them out. Legends and myths were borne of cavalry units taking on armoured vehicles. However, what is forgotten, is that the cavalry units carried anti-tank weapons for rapid deployment (Zaloga and Madej, 1991).
On the Prussian Front the German Third Army broke through defences to the north of Warsaw. Ground attacks started at 05.00 and aimed to knock out the heavy fortifications at Mlawa. It was on this front that the Polish Mazowiecka Cavalry Brigade had a number of sabre clashes with the German First Cavalry Brigade (Zaloga and Madej,1991) thus marking an end to mounted warfare. The Polish Special Operational Group Narew had virtually no contacts with German forces due to the restraining action of the Polish Third Army and therefore effectively denied rapid gains on this front.
The heaviest fighting took place in the Southwest, a front covered by Army Lodz and further south, Army Krakow. Army Poznan in the centre saw little action or contact on the first day of fighting. The German Eighth and Tenth Armies pushed through the massive densely forested areas with major infantry clashes en route. The Wolynska Cavalry Brigade successfully countered attacks by the German 4th Panzer Division whose poor co-ordination in attack delayed advance and lost equipment. This front was geographicaly the most diverse and faced the largest concentration of mechanized troops. The heaviest fighting was around the industrial zone of Katowice. In the south, the 44th and 45th Infantry Divisions attacked throught the Jablonkow Pass near Karwina and Cieszyn which were lightly defended. In the southern mountainous area, the XXII Panzer Corps attacked just below Nowy Targ at the Dunajec river which was defended by the 1st KOP Regiment and National Guard Zakopane Battalion. Army Krakow was forced to commit support to stem the attack which was temporarily held.
Outflanked and harassed by German guerrilla units, Army Krakow had to deal with a large number of armed German units set up by the Abwehr to carry out sabotage.
Once the Germans broke through the various fronts, poor communications impeded any chance of reforming on a grand scale. From the 10th until 18th September Polish units were able to reform quickly and still were able to harass and inflict serious damage. For field commanders like Anders, confusion and contradictory orders added to the pain and humiliation of the inevitable defeat. Units attempted to move south-east despite heavy co-ordinated artillery bombardments. Soldiers and civilians who were able to bear arms bravely defended and resisted for as long as possible as they moved behind the Vistula. Encirclement began and 60,000 troops were destroyed at Radom. Partisan units were organized and regular army units kept moving southeast in order to gain supplies of food and munitions and regroup to avoid annihilation once the Russians entered the war on 17th September.
Field commanders moved as many of the remnants of the army to an escape route which led to Romania and Hungary . Units breached German lines on 22nd September before Soviet troops blocked all routes. Poland finally fell on the 6th October as the last organized resistance was crushed at Hel and Kock. Zaloga and Madej (1991) estimated the Germans took 587,000 prisoners and the Soviets 200,000. Anders (1949) estimated between 200 - 300,000 escaped into Romania and Hungary through the Dukla Pass. Those who were caught by the Soviets may have been far higher (Anders, 1949). Fiedotov, an NKVD general estimated it to be nearer 475,000. However, if all those arrested including White Russians, Jews and political prisoners, the number was between 1.5 and 1.6m people. Transported to the Gulags, few survived.
One of Poland's greatest gifts towards the war effort was to have captured an Ultra machine (Stafford, 1997) early in the conflict. The true value of this encryption machine was instantly recognised by Polish and French code-breakers. Unfortunately, true recognition of its significance came later and the thanks given to the Poles hardly covers couple of sentences in either archives or in historical text..
Please write letters and call office of the President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton why US is not sending high ranking delegation to Poland 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II?
You can also call or write to the President:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Please include your e-mail address
Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461
TTY/TDD
Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121
Vice President Joe Biden
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Rahm Emanuel
Deputy Chiefs of Staff
Jim Messina
Mona Sutphen
Senior Advisors
David Axelrod
Valerie Jarrett
Pete Rouse
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
Main Switchboard:
202-647-4000
Polish American Community and people of Poland one of the US strongest allied are outrage that US is not sending high ranking delegation to this event.
70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II at Westerplatte will be attended by German chancellor Angela Merkel and Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin and other 69 Heads of States and Governments will Participante.Among those expected to be present at the Westerplatte monument on 1 September are also the prime ministers of Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, the Baltic states, Finland, as well as European Parliament president Jerzy Buzek. France and the UK, which were Poland's allies in 1939, will be represented by foreign ministers Bernard Kouchner and David Miliband.
But not from United States of America
To the entire world Westerplatte ( the Polish Thermopile ) in Poland is like Pearl Harbor to American people.
i zdrada / ...and betrayal 10
Westerplatte (1967) part03 [English Subtitles] Polish war movie
Clips from CBC mini documentary about Poland's contribution to the war effort. Polish pilots of the RAF. Betrayal of Poland by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin.
Over the course of the violent engagement some 2,600 German soldiers fought against the 205-strong garrison of stalwart Poles. The exact number of German casualties has never been disclosed, but is assumed to be quite high in comparison to the Polish figures - of the 205 Polish soldiers defending the outpost, only 14 perished (including the Polish radio operator, later executed for refusing to divulge radio codes to the German side) while 53 were wounded.
On September 1, 1939, at 04:45 local time, as Germany began its invasion of Poland, Schleswig-Holstein started to shell the Polish garrison. This was followed by a repelled attack by German naval infantry. Another two assaults that day were repelled as well. Over the coming days, the Germans repeatedly bombarded Westerplatte with naval and heavy field artillery along with dive-bombing raids by Junkers Ju 87 Stukas. Repeated attacks of 3500 German soldiers were repelled by the 180 Polish soldiers for seven days. Major Henryk Sucharski had been informed that no help from the Polish Army would come but still he decided to defend to relieve attacks on Polish coast - most of the German forces were engaged in the attacks on Westerplatte. On September 7th Major Henryk Sucharski decided to surrender due to lack of ammunition and supplies. As a sign of honor for the soldiers of Westerplatte, German commander, Gen. Eberhardt, allowed Mjr. Sucharski to keep his officer's sword while being taken prisoner.
Westerplatte Defenders Repulse Attacks From Sea, Air and Land; 70 to 200 Polish 'Suicide Troops' Shatter Two German Attempts to Storm Fortress After Plane and Ship Bombardments.
A band of Polish soldiers who for six days fought a "battle of the Alamo" under constant German siege today surrendered Westerplatte Fortress in Danzig Harbor, where the first shot of the European war was fired, according to announcement in Berlin
Westerplatte - il cimitero dei soldati caduti durante i combattimenti nel settembre 1939. Al centro la lapide del comandante, il maggiore Henryk Sucharski. L'avamposto militare di Westerplatte, secondo i piani strategici di difesa, doveva resistere al nemico soltanto 12 ore in attesa dell'arrivo dei soccorsi. Aveva invece resistito sette giorni agli attacchi furiosi della nave corazzata "Schlezwig-Holstein", della fanteria e delle forze aeree tedesche.
Sep 1, 1939 - Am 1. September 1939, einen Tag nachdem der Senat die Verdienstmedaille Danziger Kreuz beschlossen hatte, beschoss die Wehrmacht die Westerplatte, und im Gefecht um das Polnische Postamt in Danzig wurde dieses Gebäude erstürmt. Zudem trafen Truppen der.
Sep 1, 1939 - Pouco faltava para as cinco da manhã de 1 de Setembro de 1939, quando o couraçado alemão Schleswig-Holstein, ancorado na foz do Vístula no interior da Cidade Livre de Gdańsk começou a bombardear a guarnição militar polaca em Westerplatte.
Sep 2, 1939 - "The commander in chief greets the gallant garrison at Westerplatte and expects every man to stick to his sanguinary post." BY ANDREAS BACKER. I ... The call for sacrifice was directed at the "suicide battalion" which mans the Polish munitions dump of Westerplatte off Danzig harbor.
Sep 4, 1939 - After three days of bombardment from sea and air, a little Polish garrison still held the Westerplatte munitions base in Danzig Harbor tonight. ... Thirty airplanes dropped between fifty and sixty bombs on the Westerplatte yesterday, but the Poles still retaliated with machine-gun fire.
Sep 7, 1939 - When this writer left the Nazi-held city of Danzig yesterday morning a small force of Polish soldiers--between 70 and 200 of them--still resisted valiantly in Westerplatte fortress after four days of a fierce siege. Machine-gun fire from the Polish garrison shattered completely two ...
Sep 8, 1939 - A band of Polish soldiers who for six days fought a "battle of the Alamo" under constant German siege today surrendered Westerplatte Fortress in ... The Schleswig-Holstein steamed into position early is the day; trained her gone on the Westerplatte and blasted away: All that , day the ...
Sep 10, 1939 - They were aimed at the Westerplatte, a small Polish fortress, on a Danzig peninsula.. For nearly a week after Danzig had been proclaimed by Adolf Hitler a part of the Reich and German troops had occupied the city, the Polish garrison of the Westerplatte held out. ...
Today the ruins of the barracks and two blockhouses - the only structures on the island - still remain. One of the blockhouses has been converted into a museum commemorating the battle and those who fought there, with two shells from the Schleswig-Holstein ironically propping the entrance. A placid 25m tall stone monument now marks the site of this infamous exchange that preceded the levelling of Gdansk's Old Town and sparked a worldwide conflict that would result in immeasurable suffering (particularly in Poland). Though it is outside the city, Westerplatte is a worthwhile venture for anyone visiting Gdansk; like so many sights in Poland, it is haunted by it's troubling history in the face of a beautiful natural environment.
Gdansk's picturesque Westerplatte peninsula has the unhappy distinction of being the site of the official start of the Second World War. A small forested island separated from Gdansk by the harbour channel, Westerplatte was established as a Polish military outpost during the interwar period, equipped with one 75mm field gun, two 37mm antitank guns (slightly mystifying for a coastal defense), four mortars and several medium machine guns, but lacking any true fortifications. By the autumn of 1939, the Polish garrison occupying Westerplatte comprised of 182 soldiers expected to withstand a potential attack for twelve hours.
In late August, 1939, under the suspect pretense of an amiable courtesy visit, the German battleship Schleswig-Holstein dropped anchor in the channel off Westerplatte and on September 1, at exactly 04:45 local time, began it's barrage of the Polish outpost with its superior 280 and 150mm guns. Thus began Germany's invasion of Poland, igniting the powderkeg that would explode into World War II.
Expecting an easy victory, the German offensive was sternly repelled by Polish small arms and machine gun fire, and suffered unexpected losses during two more assaults upon Westerplatte the same day. The only Polish 75mm gun was destroyed after discharging 28 shells into the German position across the channel. Despite a German naval infantry invasion, sustained bombardment by heavy artillery and diving airraids from German warplanes, the Polish garrison repulsed the Germans for seven days, before the depleted unit, suffering from exhaustion, severe injury and a shortage of food, water, ammunition and medical supplies, was forced to surrender on September 7th.
A Song of the Soldiers of Westerplatte
Boleslaw Prus
When their days had been filled
and it was time to die in the summer,
They went straight to heaven in a coach-and-four,
the soldiers of Westerplatte.
(Summer was beautiful that year.)
They sang: "Ah, ‘tis nothing
that our wounds were so painful,
for now it is sweet to walk
the heavenly fields."
(On earth that year there was plenty of heather for bouquets.)
In Gdansk we stood like a wall
in defiance of the German offensive,
now we soar among the clouds,
we soldiers of Westerplatte.
Those with keen sense of sight
and sound are said to have heard
in the clouds the measured step
of the Maratime Batallion.
This was the song they heard: "We'll
take advantage of the sunshine
and bask in the warm days
in the heather fields of paradise.
But when the cold wind blows
and sorrow courses the earth,
We'll float down to the center of Warsaw,
The soldiers of Westerplatte."
-translated by Walter Whipple
1st September 1939
At 04.30 Stuka dive-bombers prematurely bombed the bridge at Tczew in the Pomeranian Corridor. SS troops dressed in Polish uniforms attacked the radio station at Gleiwitz and broadcast inflammatory statements urging Polish minorities to take up arms against Hitler. For a touch of realism, several bodies of concentration inmates dressed in Polish uniforms, were left behind as 'evidence' for journalists (Zaloga and Madej, 1991) to report on.
The Free City of Danzig was heavily shelled and bombed, inflicting heavy casualties upon the civilian population and military coastal defences or navy flotillas. In Danzig, the defenders, particularly civilian volunteers were shot. The Army Pomorze faced the 4th Army whose tactic was to isolate them in the north from the rest of the Polish Forces and then link up with the Third Army and attack Warsaw.
Daylong fighting produced at times, scenes of sheer heroism. The Pomorska Cavalry Brigade had been in contacts with the German 20th Motorized Infantry Division. Colonel Masterlarz had half the unit mount up and attempted a surprise attack from the rear. Catching an infantry battalion by surprise in a woodland clearing, the sabre attack wiped them out. Legends and myths were borne of cavalry units taking on armoured vehicles. However, what is forgotten, is that the cavalry units carried anti-tank weapons for rapid deployment (Zaloga and Madej, 1991).
On the Prussian Front the German Third Army broke through defences to the north of Warsaw. Ground attacks started at 05.00 and aimed to knock out the heavy fortifications at Mlawa. It was on this front that the Polish Mazowiecka Cavalry Brigade had a number of sabre clashes with the German First Cavalry Brigade (Zaloga and Madej,1991) thus marking an end to mounted warfare. The Polish Special Operational Group Narew had virtually no contacts with German forces due to the restraining action of the Polish Third Army and therefore effectively denied rapid gains on this front.
The heaviest fighting took place in the Southwest, a front covered by Army Lodz and further south, Army Krakow. Army Poznan in the centre saw little action or contact on the first day of fighting. The German Eighth and Tenth Armies pushed through the massive densely forested areas with major infantry clashes en route. The Wolynska Cavalry Brigade successfully countered attacks by the German 4th Panzer Division whose poor co-ordination in attack delayed advance and lost equipment. This front was geographicaly the most diverse and faced the largest concentration of mechanized troops. The heaviest fighting was around the industrial zone of Katowice. In the south, the 44th and 45th Infantry Divisions attacked throught the Jablonkow Pass near Karwina and Cieszyn which were lightly defended. In the southern mountainous area, the XXII Panzer Corps attacked just below Nowy Targ at the Dunajec river which was defended by the 1st KOP Regiment and National Guard Zakopane Battalion. Army Krakow was forced to commit support to stem the attack which was temporarily held.
Outflanked and harassed by German guerrilla units, Army Krakow had to deal with a large number of armed German units set up by the Abwehr to carry out sabotage.
Once the Germans broke through the various fronts, poor communications impeded any chance of reforming on a grand scale. From the 10th until 18th September Polish units were able to reform quickly and still were able to harass and inflict serious damage. For field commanders like Anders, confusion and contradictory orders added to the pain and humiliation of the inevitable defeat. Units attempted to move south-east despite heavy co-ordinated artillery bombardments. Soldiers and civilians who were able to bear arms bravely defended and resisted for as long as possible as they moved behind the Vistula. Encirclement began and 60,000 troops were destroyed at Radom. Partisan units were organized and regular army units kept moving southeast in order to gain supplies of food and munitions and regroup to avoid annihilation once the Russians entered the war on 17th September.
Field commanders moved as many of the remnants of the army to an escape route which led to Romania and Hungary . Units breached German lines on 22nd September before Soviet troops blocked all routes. Poland finally fell on the 6th October as the last organized resistance was crushed at Hel and Kock. Zaloga and Madej (1991) estimated the Germans took 587,000 prisoners and the Soviets 200,000. Anders (1949) estimated between 200 - 300,000 escaped into Romania and Hungary through the Dukla Pass. Those who were caught by the Soviets may have been far higher (Anders, 1949). Fiedotov, an NKVD general estimated it to be nearer 475,000. However, if all those arrested including White Russians, Jews and political prisoners, the number was between 1.5 and 1.6m people. Transported to the Gulags, few survived.
One of Poland's greatest gifts towards the war effort was to have captured an Ultra machine (Stafford, 1997) early in the conflict. The true value of this encryption machine was instantly recognised by Polish and French code-breakers. Unfortunately, true recognition of its significance came later and the thanks given to the Poles hardly covers couple of sentences in either archives or in historical text..
Please write letters and call office of the President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton why US is not sending high ranking delegation to Poland 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II?
You can also call or write to the President:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Please include your e-mail address
Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461
TTY/TDD
Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121
Vice President Joe Biden
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Rahm Emanuel
Deputy Chiefs of Staff
Jim Messina
Mona Sutphen
Senior Advisors
David Axelrod
Valerie Jarrett
Pete Rouse
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
Main Switchboard:
202-647-4000
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)